Although not required to reach a final merits determination after finding the Petitioner met fewer than three criteria, AAO reviewed the record in the aggregate and found it does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement at the very top of the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although not required to reach a final merits determination after finding the Petitioner met fewer than three criteria, AAO reviewed the record in the aggregate and found it does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement at the very top of the field.
The expert and colleague letters were insufficiently specific to establish that the Petitioner's contributions had a major impact on the overall field. Citation counts were not shown to be commensurate with major significance. Conference presentations, research funding, and the app pilot program did not establish widespread field-level influence.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The expert and colleague letters were insufficiently specific to establish that the Petitioner's contributions had a major impact on the overall field. Citation counts were not shown to be commensurate with major significance. Conference presentations, research funding, and the app pilot program did not establish widespread field-level influence.
AAO conducted a de novo review of tax returns and Sonegawa totality factors and concluded the Petitioner did not establish ability to pay the $80,000 proffered wage from the 2016 priority date onward.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO conducted a de novo review of tax returns and Sonegawa totality factors and concluded the Petitioner did not establish ability to pay the $80,000 proffered wage from the 2016 priority date onward.
AAO affirmed the Director's finding, citing the USCIS Policy Memorandum's definition of scholarly articles as original research or expert writing for learned persons in the field. The Petitioner's articles in Data Driven Investor appear to be blog posts offering general personnel advice to entrepreneurs, not scholarly articles.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding, citing the USCIS Policy Memorandum's definition of scholarly articles as original research or expert writing for learned persons in the field. The Petitioner's articles in Data Driven Investor appear to be blog posts offering general personnel advice to entrepreneurs, not scholarly articles.
While AAO agreed the program is not a course of instruction, the Petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence that he is a member of the program or to establish the membership requirements. Program officials only described him as a participant in events or programs, not a member of an association.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
While AAO agreed the program is not a course of instruction, the Petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence that he is a member of the program or to establish the membership requirements. Program officials only described him as a participant in events or programs, not a member of an association. The Ambassador Program also was not shown to be an independent association with members chosen by national or international experts.
AAO stated it need not provide a formal final merits determination since the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO stated it need not provide a formal final merits determination since the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.