可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 13821–13830

EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or significantly high remuneration

AAO 为什么未被说服

Although paystubs were listed in the briefs, the financial documentation was not actually contained in the record. Even if the salary had been established, the record lacked geographical or position-appropriate compensation surveys showing the salary is high relative to other mobile application developers.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although paystubs were listed in the briefs, the financial documentation was not actually contained in the record. Even if the salary had been established, the record lacked geographical or position-appropriate compensation surveys showing the salary is high relative to other mobile application developers.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-19_02_B2203; source_row=24889
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not provide evidence showing the Beneficiary displayed his work at these events, and the conferences were primarily commercial in nature rather than artistic exhibitions or showcases as required by the regulation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not provide evidence showing the Beneficiary displayed his work at these events, and the conferences were primarily commercial in nature rather than artistic exhibitions or showcases as required by the regulation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-19_02_B2203; source_row=24888
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not submit corroborating evidence such as correspondence confirming the Beneficiary's participation as a judge, materials identifying him in such a role, or other relevant documentation.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not submit corroborating evidence such as correspondence confirming the Beneficiary's participation as a judge, materials identifying him in such a role, or other relevant documentation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-19_02_B2203; source_row=24887
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in qualifying associations

AAO 为什么未被说服

The criterion requires membership of the Beneficiary, not the Petitioner. The Petitioner failed to show these organizations extend individual membership, that the Petitioner's partnerships equate to the Beneficiary's membership, or that these organizations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The criterion requires membership of the Beneficiary, not the Petitioner. The Petitioner failed to show these organizations extend individual membership, that the Petitioner's partnerships equate to the Beneficiary's membership, or that these organizations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-19_02_B2203; source_row=24885
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record contained numerous articles about the Petitioner, its products, and its business activities, but none were about the Beneficiary relating to his work. Articles about an employer do not satisfy this criterion, and the Petitioner failed to provide comparative circulation statistics to establish major media status.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record contained numerous articles about the Petitioner, its products, and its business activities, but none were about the Beneficiary relating to his work. Articles about an employer do not satisfy this criterion, and the Petitioner failed to provide comparative circulation statistics to establish major media status.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-19_02_B2203; source_row=24886
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学118 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner has authored scholarly articles in professional publications, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner has authored scholarly articles in professional publications, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-19_01_B2203; source_row=24882
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学118 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

The record shows the Petitioner reviewed papers for journals, satisfying the judging criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record shows the Petitioner reviewed papers for journals, satisfying the judging criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-19_01_B2203; source_row=24881
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学118 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-19_01_B2203; source_row=24884
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Beneficiary could not satisfy three criteria in any event, making the analysis unnecessary to the result.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Beneficiary could not satisfy three criteria in any event, making the analysis unnecessary to the result.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-19_02_B2203; source_row=24890
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO did not conduct a formal final merits determination as the initial evidence threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim and recognition.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not conduct a formal final merits determination as the initial evidence threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim and recognition.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-19_02_B2203; source_row=24892
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评