可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 13871–13880

EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

Even where the role was leading or critical (e.g., Principal Violin II), the record did not establish that the orchestras or ensembles enjoyed distinguished reputations. Letters from organization insiders, isolated programs, and a single 1987 New York Times article were insufficient.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Even where the role was leading or critical (e.g., Principal Violin II), the record did not establish that the orchestras or ensembles enjoyed distinguished reputations. Letters from organization insiders, isolated programs, and a single 1987 New York Times article were insufficient.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-10_02_B2203; source_row=24826
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not establish her articles were written for learned persons in the field, nor that La Musica or Mom & I qualify as professional publications, major trade publications, or other major media.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not establish her articles were written for learned persons in the field, nor that La Musica or Mom & I qualify as professional publications, major trade publications, or other major media.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-10_02_B2203; source_row=24824
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The rulebooks and criteria documents submitted establish how points are awarded at competitions but do not demonstrate the national or international significance of the specific awards won. The record lacks evidence that these awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in martial arts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The rulebooks and criteria documents submitted establish how points are awarded at competitions but do not demonstrate the national or international significance of the specific awards won. The record lacks evidence that these awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in martial arts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-10_01_B2203; source_row=24815
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

Most articles lack an author as required by the criterion. The Petitioner did not submit comparative evidence showing circulation statistics are high relative to other publications or that the outlets constitute professional, major trade, or major media publications. Some articles are not about the Petitioner.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Most articles lack an author as required by the criterion. The Petitioner did not submit comparative evidence showing circulation statistics are high relative to other publications or that the outlets constitute professional, major trade, or major media publications. Some articles are not about the Petitioner.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-10_01_B2203; source_row=24816
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the Director's finding on this criterion. While the evidence establishes that the Petitioner served as a referee at martial arts events, he did not provide a description of his duties demonstrating that refereeing involved evaluating or judging the work or skills of competitors, as opposed to enforcing rules and ensuring sportsmanlike conduct.…

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding on this criterion. While the evidence establishes that the Petitioner served as a referee at martial arts events, he did not provide a description of his duties demonstrating that refereeing involved evaluating or judging the work or skills of competitors, as opposed to enforcing rules and ensuring sportsmanlike conduct. The World Kickboxing Federation rulebook indicated that referees enforce rules while judges score matches, and no equivalent evidence was provided for the WMF or WKPA events.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-10_01_B2203; source_row=24817
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO acknowledged the record shows substantial merit in the Petitioner's proposed entrepreneurial work, but found insufficient evidence that the specific proposed endeavor has national importance, as it would not impact his field or U.S. trade more broadly beyond his immediate clientele and lacked demonstrated significant potential for U.S. job creation or substantial positive economic effects.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO acknowledged the record shows substantial merit in the Petitioner's proposed entrepreneurial work, but found insufficient evidence that the specific proposed endeavor has national importance, as it would not impact his field or U.S. trade more broadly beyond his immediate clientele and lacked demonstrated significant potential for U.S. job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-10_01_B5203; source_row=24819
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程博士

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to analyze the third prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to analyze the third prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-10_02_B5203; source_row=24829
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程博士

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to analyze the second prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to analyze the second prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-10_02_B5203; source_row=24828
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

artistic display of work

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the display criterion based on her modeling in fashion shows and acting in television soap operas.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the display criterion based on her modeling in fashion shows and acting in television soap operas.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-10_03_B2203; source_row=24833
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

The AAO agreed there was sufficient evidence that the Petitioner participated as a judge of the work of other musicians at the International Music Competition.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed there was sufficient evidence that the Petitioner participated as a judge of the work of other musicians at the International Music Competition.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-12-10_02_B2203; source_row=24823
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评