12 months qualifying experience including Teradata and Informatica
AAO 为什么未被说服
The duties of the Beneficiary's programmer analyst role with the Petitioner appear substantially comparable to the offered database administrator position, so under 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(i)(3) that experience cannot be used to qualify him, and no other experience evidence was submitted.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The duties of the Beneficiary's programmer analyst role with the Petitioner appear substantially comparable to the offered database administrator position, so under 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(i)(3) that experience cannot be used to qualify him, and no other experience evidence was submitted.
AAO found that the recommendation letters showed unmistakable evidence of shared authorship undermining their independent value; citation metrics placed the Petitioner above average but not at the top of the field; peer review invitations did not demonstrate acclaim; the NSF SBIR was a grant not an award; and commercialization was embryonic.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the recommendation letters showed unmistakable evidence of shared authorship undermining their independent value; citation metrics placed the Petitioner above average but not at the top of the field; peer review invitations did not demonstrate acclaim; the NSF SBIR was a grant not an award; and commercialization was embryonic. Focusing only on the most highly-cited articles conflated isolated major contributions with sustained acclaim.
The Petitioner could not establish the total combined proffered wages because one petition's proffered wage was never provided. Even setting that aside, net income and net current assets were far below the $267,492.55 shortfall, unaudited financials were unreliable due to unexplained discrepancies, and Sonegawa factors did not overcome the gap.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner could not establish the total combined proffered wages because one petition's proffered wage was never provided. Even setting that aside, net income and net current assets were far below the $267,492.55 shortfall, unaudited financials were unreliable due to unexplained discrepancies, and Sonegawa factors did not overcome the gap.
degree in acceptable field per labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Beneficiary holds a bachelor of engineering evaluated as equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's in 'computer engineering,' but the labor certification's part H.14 limits acceptable baccalaureate fields to computer science, applications, and engineering sub-fields of electronics, mechanical, civil, or electrical — not computer engineering.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Beneficiary holds a bachelor of engineering evaluated as equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's in 'computer engineering,' but the labor certification's part H.14 limits acceptable baccalaureate fields to computer science, applications, and engineering sub-fields of electronics, mechanical, civil, or electrical — not computer engineering. The record therefore does not establish the Beneficiary meets the minimum educational requirements.
The AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that serving as an umpire or referee at table tennis competitions does not constitute judging the work of others, as the role involves enforcing rules rather than evaluating the skills or work of competitors, and the record lacked evidence showing otherwise.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that serving as an umpire or referee at table tennis competitions does not constitute judging the work of others, as the role involves enforcing rules rather than evaluating the skills or work of competitors, and the record lacked evidence showing otherwise.
leading or critical role for distinguished organization
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner failed to establish both that he performed a critical role and that the organization has a distinguished reputation. The letters submitted lacked specific, detailed information about how his performance was critical to the organization's success, and the record did not establish the organization's distinguished reputation beyond general assertions.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to establish both that he performed a critical role and that the organization has a distinguished reputation. The letters submitted lacked specific, detailed information about how his performance was critical to the organization's success, and the record did not establish the organization's distinguished reputation beyond general assertions.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not establish that membership in the club requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts, and failed to provide the organization's constitution or bylaws or otherwise demonstrate the membership selection criteria.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not establish that membership in the club requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts, and failed to provide the organization's constitution or bylaws or otherwise demonstrate the membership selection criteria.
While AAO agreed the correct comparator is others in the field (not just those at the top), the Petitioner failed to provide Brazilian wage statistics to compare against her Brazilian-currency contracts, and the single USD contract did not establish an hourly or daily rate or provide adequate comparator evidence for U.S. models.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
While AAO agreed the correct comparator is others in the field (not just those at the top), the Petitioner failed to provide Brazilian wage statistics to compare against her Brazilian-currency contracts, and the single USD contract did not establish an hourly or daily rate or provide adequate comparator evidence for U.S. models.
The Petitioner did not submit evidence demonstrating that her selection as the competition winner is a nationally or internationally recognized award for excellence in the field. Additionally, her selection to the modeling group was a requirement for competition participation, not itself an award or prize.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not submit evidence demonstrating that her selection as the competition winner is a nationally or internationally recognized award for excellence in the field. Additionally, her selection to the modeling group was a requirement for competition participation, not itself an award or prize.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
The recommendation letters did not contain specific examples of how the Petitioner's role was of significant importance to the organizations' activities. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to submit sufficient evidence that the organizations had a distinguished reputation, as relative size and social media followers are not determining factors and the memo was conclusory.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The recommendation letters did not contain specific examples of how the Petitioner's role was of significant importance to the organizations' activities. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to submit sufficient evidence that the organizations had a distinguished reputation, as relative size and social media followers are not determining factors and the memo was conclusory.