可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 13961–13970

EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

Because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold of three criteria, a formal final merits determination was unnecessary under Kazarian. The AAO noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold of three criteria, a formal final merits determination was unnecessary under Kazarian. The AAO noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_04_B2203; source_row=24735
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's published articles in recognized journals satisfy this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's published articles in recognized journals satisfy this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_04_B2203; source_row=24733
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organization

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO agreed that while the Petitioner's colleagues praised her contributions to specific projects, the letters did not explain how her role was of significant importance to the outcome or standing of the organization as a whole, and the record lacked documentation of her job duties or placement in the company hierarchy.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed that while the Petitioner's colleagues praised her contributions to specific projects, the letters did not explain how her role was of significant importance to the outcome or standing of the organization as a whole, and the record lacked documentation of her job duties or placement in the company hierarchy.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_04_B2203; source_row=24734
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion based on her peer review services for three journals.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion based on her peer review services for three journals.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_04_B2203; source_row=24731
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他1,999 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

prizes or awards

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the record establishes the Petitioner won a qualifying award in 1999.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the record establishes the Petitioner won a qualifying award in 1999.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_02_B2203; source_row=24720
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他1,999 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to make a formal final merits determination since step 1 was not satisfied, while noting in the aggregate the record would not support sustained acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to make a formal final merits determination since step 1 was not satisfied, while noting in the aggregate the record would not support sustained acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_02_B2203; source_row=24723
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

环境 / 能源

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion. AAO did not provide separate analysis beyond confirming the Director's finding.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion. AAO did not provide separate analysis beyond confirming the Director's finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=24716
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

环境 / 能源

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=24719
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

环境 / 能源

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion. AAO did not provide separate analysis beyond confirming the Director's finding.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion. AAO did not provide separate analysis beyond confirming the Director's finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=24718
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of the individual's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

AAO 为什么未被说服

Exhibits 'p' through 's' referenced in the cover letter as supporting this criterion were never actually submitted with the RFE response; remaining evidence was a partially illegible photograph and a photograph of a badge without official festival documentation, which was insufficient.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Exhibits 'p' through 's' referenced in the cover letter as supporting this criterion were never actually submitted with the RFE response; remaining evidence was a partially illegible photograph and a photograph of a badge without official festival documentation, which was insufficient.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-11-21_05_B2203; source_row=24738
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评