The record did not demonstrate CECIEx's criteria for board membership or its selection process. While other board members may be highly qualified, comparing oneself to other members is insufficient. The record did not show CECIEx requires outstanding achievements, as judged by recognized national or international experts, to be appointed to its board.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record did not demonstrate CECIEx's criteria for board membership or its selection process. While other board members may be highly qualified, comparing oneself to other members is insufficient. The record did not show CECIEx requires outstanding achievements, as judged by recognized national or international experts, to be appointed to its board.
The recommendation letters did not demonstrate the impact or influence of the Petitioner's work at a level of major significance in the field as a whole. The training manual's influence was limited to a single program and did not show widespread implementation or seminal impact on the broader field. Conference presentations alone were insufficient absent evidence of major significance.…
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The recommendation letters did not demonstrate the impact or influence of the Petitioner's work at a level of major significance in the field as a whole. The training manual's influence was limited to a single program and did not show widespread implementation or seminal impact on the broader field. Conference presentations alone were insufficient absent evidence of major significance. The letters were conclusory and lacked specifics.
The articles were not about the Petitioner but focused on projects, merely mentioning or quoting him. One article lacked an identified author. Articles that are not about the petitioner do not satisfy this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The articles were not about the Petitioner but focused on projects, merely mentioning or quoting him. One article lacked an identified author. Articles that are not about the petitioner do not satisfy this criterion.
The Order of Business Merit award lacked explanation connecting the Portuguese Republic award documentation to the actual certificate received. The remaining awards were given to the Petitioner's company, not to him personally; even assuming company awards could count, he did not show he was responsible for the recognized achievements.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Order of Business Merit award lacked explanation connecting the Portuguese Republic award documentation to the actual certificate received. The remaining awards were given to the Petitioner's company, not to him personally; even assuming company awards could count, he did not show he was responsible for the recognized achievements. None of the awards were shown to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field beyond the awarding entities.
The company's income tax return did not show the Petitioner's personal salary or remuneration. The evidence did not demonstrate that his earnings placed him at the high end of the spectrum for chief executives, and he provided no evidence of other significantly high remuneration.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The company's income tax return did not show the Petitioner's personal salary or remuneration. The evidence did not demonstrate that his earnings placed him at the high end of the spectrum for chief executives, and he provided no evidence of other significantly high remuneration.
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Employment as a contract artist does not constitute 'membership' in an association, and the Petitioner did not show that outstanding achievements are required for band membership or that membership judges are recognized national or international experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Employment as a contract artist does not constitute 'membership' in an association, and the Petitioner did not show that outstanding achievements are required for band membership or that membership judges are recognized national or international experts.
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the marketing materials were not published material about the Petitioner, the articles were about the band rather than the Petitioner, the publications were not shown to be major media, and required elements (title, date, author) were missing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the marketing materials were not published material about the Petitioner, the articles were about the band rather than the Petitioner, the publications were not shown to be major media, and required elements (title, date, author) were missing.