可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 14241–14250

NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Foreign equivalent degree to U.S. baccalaureate

AAO 为什么未被说服

EDGE, a recognized resource for foreign credential evaluation, indicates that a three-year bachelor of computer applications in India is comparable to only three years of U.S. university study, not a full bachelor's degree.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
EDGE, a recognized resource for foreign credential evaluation, indicates that a three-year bachelor of computer applications in India is comparable to only three years of U.S. university study, not a full bachelor's degree. The submitted evaluations are given little probative weight because they fail to provide a substantive rationale—one attempts to stack a prior diploma's credits onto the bachelor's degree without explanation, while the other invokes university ranking and student marks rather than coursework volume and substance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-19_01_B5203; source_row=24420
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree or foreign equivalent

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO concluded the conflicting English translations of the degree, lack of transcripts from the issuing institution, transcripts from a different institution that did not match the claimed degree, and non-credible credentials evaluations failed to establish the Beneficiary's possession of a U.S. bachelor's or foreign equivalent.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the conflicting English translations of the degree, lack of transcripts from the issuing institution, transcripts from a different institution that did not match the claimed degree, and non-credible credentials evaluations failed to establish the Beneficiary's possession of a U.S. bachelor's or foreign equivalent.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-18_01_B5203; source_row=24417
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner submitted only wage payment evidence for 2017 and no regulatory-prescribed evidence for 2018, and did not address its ability to pay multiple I-140 beneficiaries.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted only wage payment evidence for 2017 and no regulatory-prescribed evidence for 2018, and did not address its ability to pay multiple I-140 beneficiaries.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-18_01_B5203; source_row=24419
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

other

60 months of qualifying experience per labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Beneficiary's experience with the Petitioner could not count toward the required 60 months because the duties were substantially comparable to the offered position, and no qualifying experience letters from other employers were submitted.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Beneficiary's experience with the Petitioner could not count toward the required 60 months because the duties were substantially comparable to the offered position, and no qualifying experience letters from other employers were submitted.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-18_01_B5203; source_row=24418
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the letters lacked specific, detailed information about the Petitioner's duties and responsibilities, did not show his positions fit within the overall organizational hierarchy, and failed to demonstrate that the organizations have a distinguished reputation. A post-filing appointment also cannot establish eligibility.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the letters lacked specific, detailed information about the Petitioner's duties and responsibilities, did not show his positions fit within the overall organizational hierarchy, and failed to demonstrate that the organizations have a distinguished reputation. A post-filing appointment also cannot establish eligibility.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-17_01_B2203; source_row=24413
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner has not shown his articles and television segments were written for 'learned' persons rather than the general population, and they do not possess the characteristics of scholarly articles.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner has not shown his articles and television segments were written for 'learned' persons rather than the general population, and they do not possess the characteristics of scholarly articles.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-17_01_B2203; source_row=24412
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations

AAO 为什么未被说服

Petitioner did not provide membership requirements for the associations to show they require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The FPC credential is a press pass rather than association membership based on outstanding achievements.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not provide membership requirements for the associations to show they require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The FPC credential is a press pass rather than association membership based on outstanding achievements.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-17_01_B2203; source_row=24408
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 商业成功未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 商业成功

commercial successes in the performing arts / comparable evidence

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner has not shown why he cannot offer evidence meeting at least three criteria, has not shown journalism falls within the performing arts, and has not explained which evidence should be considered as truly comparable to this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner has not shown why he cannot offer evidence meeting at least three criteria, has not shown journalism falls within the performing arts, and has not explained which evidence should be considered as truly comparable to this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-17_01_B2203; source_row=24415
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

AAO 为什么未被说服

The letters do not discuss whose work the Petitioner judged or specific news reports edited; the content editor appointment does not demonstrate actual judging of others' work; and a post-filing appointment cannot establish eligibility.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters do not discuss whose work the Petitioner judged or specific news reports edited; the content editor appointment does not demonstrate actual judging of others' work; and a post-filing appointment cannot establish eligibility.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-17_01_B2203; source_row=24410
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The letters do not provide sufficiently detailed information or adequate corroborating documentation to show that the Petitioner's work constitutes original contributions of major significance in the field, and they do not explain how his contributions have risen to the required level.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters do not provide sufficiently detailed information or adequate corroborating documentation to show that the Petitioner's work constitutes original contributions of major significance in the field, and they do not explain how his contributions have risen to the required level.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-09-17_01_B2203; source_row=24411
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评