AAO found three of the four articles lacked identified authors and thus failed regulatory requirements; the voakl.net blog article did identify an author but the record did not establish it constitutes a professional or major trade publication or major media. Moreover, none of the articles were actually about the Petitioner — they focused on projects or only briefly quoted or mentioned him.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found three of the four articles lacked identified authors and thus failed regulatory requirements; the voakl.net blog article did identify an author but the record did not establish it constitutes a professional or major trade publication or major media. Moreover, none of the articles were actually about the Petitioner — they focused on projects or only briefly quoted or mentioned him.
AAO found the letters described high-profile projects and attested to the Petitioner's expertise but did not establish specifically what his original contributions were or how they amounted to contributions of major significance to the field at large. The letters showed benefit to the organizations involved rather than impact on the field as a whole.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the letters described high-profile projects and attested to the Petitioner's expertise but did not establish specifically what his original contributions were or how they amounted to contributions of major significance to the field at large. The letters showed benefit to the organizations involved rather than impact on the field as a whole.
The Petitioner did not hold a leadership position within ESA, and the evidence failed to show that her service as a position statement writer contributed in a way that was of significant importance to the success or standing of ESA. A general characterization of her role as 'critical' without specific examples is insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not hold a leadership position within ESA, and the evidence failed to show that her service as a position statement writer contributed in a way that was of significant importance to the success or standing of ESA. A general characterization of her role as 'critical' without specific examples is insufficient.
AAO agreed the record confirms the Beneficiary served as a manuscript reviewer for professional journals such as JSM Pediatric Surgery and Saudi Medical Journal, satisfying the judging criterion.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the record confirms the Beneficiary served as a manuscript reviewer for professional journals such as JSM Pediatric Surgery and Saudi Medical Journal, satisfying the judging criterion.
AAO found that the offer of employment stating $252,000 salary and $48,000 bonus, combined with BLS data showing the top 10% of civil engineers earned $132,880 and Australian salary data showing the Petitioner's income was well above the upper quartile, sufficiently established that the Petitioner commanded a high salary in relation to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the offer of employment stating $252,000 salary and $48,000 bonus, combined with BLS data showing the top 10% of civil engineers earned $132,880 and Australian salary data showing the Petitioner's income was well above the upper quartile, sufficiently established that the Petitioner commanded a high salary in relation to others in the field.