可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 14391–14400

EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the evidence did not demonstrate that the Petitioner's duties as a handball referee/judge involved evaluating or judging the work or skills of competitors, as opposed to merely enforcing rules. Furthermore, the appointment letter did not show that the Petitioner actually served in the position or that the duties involved judging the work of others.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the evidence did not demonstrate that the Petitioner's duties as a handball referee/judge involved evaluating or judging the work or skills of competitors, as opposed to merely enforcing rules. Furthermore, the appointment letter did not show that the Petitioner actually served in the position or that the duties involved judging the work of others.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-30_01_B2203; source_row=24252
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or significantly high remuneration

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner did not compare his salary to others in the same field (handball players), but rather to the general average for culture and sport. The comparison to a broader occupational category rather than to other handball players was insufficient to establish high salary relative to others in the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner did not compare his salary to others in the same field (handball players), but rather to the general average for culture and sport. The comparison to a broader occupational category rather than to other handball players was insufficient to establish high salary relative to others in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-30_01_B2203; source_row=24254
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the Petitioner performed in a leading role as team captain, but found he did not demonstrate that his team had a distinguished reputation. League standings and membership regulations were insufficient to establish eminence or distinction relative to other handball teams.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner performed in a leading role as team captain, but found he did not demonstrate that his team had a distinguished reputation. League standings and membership regulations were insufficient to establish eminence or distinction relative to other handball teams.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-30_01_B2203; source_row=24253
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner did not demonstrate membership with an Olympic team. The letter from the Handball Sports School confirmed only membership on a junior national team, and the Petitioner did not show that Olympic reserve status or junior national team membership is equivalent to Olympic team membership.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner did not demonstrate membership with an Olympic team. The letter from the Handball Sports School confirmed only membership on a junior national team, and the Petitioner did not show that Olympic reserve status or junior national team membership is equivalent to Olympic team membership.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-30_01_B2203; source_row=24250
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-30_01_B2203; source_row=24255
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner did not establish that sobaka.ru qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium. The website's self-promotional claims about readership were not supported by independent, objective evidence, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate the significance of the claimed 800 thousand monthly visitors.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish that sobaka.ru qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium. The website's self-promotional claims about readership were not supported by independent, objective evidence, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate the significance of the claimed 800 thousand monthly visitors.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-30_01_B2203; source_row=24251
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

awards

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner received nationally recognized awards at handball tournaments in Russia, satisfying the awards criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner received nationally recognized awards at handball tournaments in Russia, satisfying the awards criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-30_01_B2203; source_row=24249
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not submit financial statements for 2018, the year of the priority date, and thus the record does not establish ability to pay from the priority date forward. AAO also noted the Petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay the combined proffered wages of this and at least 10 other approved petitions.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not submit financial statements for 2018, the year of the priority date, and thus the record does not establish ability to pay from the priority date forward. AAO also noted the Petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay the combined proffered wages of this and at least 10 other approved petitions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-30_02_B5203; source_row=24259
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary met all DOL-certified position requirements by priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO affirmed that a beneficiary must meet all DOL-certified job requirements by the petition's priority date. The Beneficiary had not completed the fellowship or attained critical care certification eligibility by January 18, 2018.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed that a beneficiary must meet all DOL-certified job requirements by the petition's priority date. The Beneficiary had not completed the fellowship or attained critical care certification eligibility by January 18, 2018. The Petitioner's own appeal brief confirmed the fellowship and certification were necessary to perform the job duties, and Wing's Tea House forecloses allowance of a priority date when the beneficiary is not yet qualified.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-30_02_B5203; source_row=24258
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

authenticity of wage payment evidence (Form W-2)

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Form W-2 ascribes a different Social Security number to the Beneficiary than indicated on the Form I-140, casting doubt on its authenticity, so AAO will not credit the claimed payment toward the proffered wage.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Form W-2 ascribes a different Social Security number to the Beneficiary than indicated on the Form I-140, casting doubt on its authenticity, so AAO will not credit the claimed payment toward the proffered wage.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-07-30_01_B5203; source_row=24257
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评