The Petitioner compared his creative director salary to graphic designer salaries rather than to other creative directors, making the comparison inapposite. Even using national average data for creative directors from payscale.com, the Petitioner's salary was near the 75th percentile, not demonstrating a high salary in relation to other creative directors.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner compared his creative director salary to graphic designer salaries rather than to other creative directors, making the comparison inapposite. Even using national average data for creative directors from payscale.com, the Petitioner's salary was near the 75th percentile, not demonstrating a high salary in relation to other creative directors.
While the Petitioner's portfolio demonstrates originality, he did not show how his designs have been of major significance in the field. Letters were either too general, used identical language raising questions about independent preparation, or merely repeated regulatory language without providing specific evidence of impact in the overall field.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
While the Petitioner's portfolio demonstrates originality, he did not show how his designs have been of major significance in the field. Letters were either too general, used identical language raising questions about independent preparation, or merely repeated regulatory language without providing specific evidence of impact in the overall field.
The awards were received by the Petitioner's employer, not the Petitioner individually. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to provide objective corroborating evidence of the national or international recognition of any awards for excellence in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The awards were received by the Petitioner's employer, not the Petitioner individually. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to provide objective corroborating evidence of the national or international recognition of any awards for excellence in the field.
The Petitioner provided background screenshots about ADC and AIGA but did not provide the membership requirements demonstrating that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner provided background screenshots about ADC and AIGA but did not provide the membership requirements demonstrating that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
The submitted screenshots were about branding, marketing, and design projects for various companies rather than published material about the Petitioner himself. The screenshots never mention the Petitioner.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted screenshots were about branding, marketing, and design projects for various companies rather than published material about the Petitioner himself. The screenshots never mention the Petitioner.
While one letter detailed the Petitioner's responsibilities and accomplishments contributing to the overall success of one company (demonstrating a critical role there), the Petitioner failed to establish that the organization enjoys a distinguished reputation. The record lacked sufficient evidence of the company's standing in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
While one letter detailed the Petitioner's responsibilities and accomplishments contributing to the overall success of one company (demonstrating a critical role there), the Petitioner failed to establish that the organization enjoys a distinguished reputation. The record lacked sufficient evidence of the company's standing in the field.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The awards were won by the Petitioner's employer, not the Petitioner herself. The regulation focuses on 'the alien's' receipt of awards. Additionally, the evidence did not show the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and for the 2013 award the company was only a finalist, not a winner.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The awards were won by the Petitioner's employer, not the Petitioner herself. The regulation focuses on 'the alien's' receipt of awards. Additionally, the evidence did not show the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and for the 2013 award the company was only a finalist, not a winner.
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
AAO 为什么未被说服
The boat shows were commercial in nature and not 'artistic exhibitions or showcases.' The Petitioner's comparable evidence argument failed because she had not shown that the listed criteria do not readily apply to her occupation — she had in fact claimed to meet more than three criteria, negating the predicate for a comparable evidence claim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The boat shows were commercial in nature and not 'artistic exhibitions or showcases.' The Petitioner's comparable evidence argument failed because she had not shown that the listed criteria do not readily apply to her occupation — she had in fact claimed to meet more than three criteria, negating the predicate for a comparable evidence claim.
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The GreekReporter.com article relied on self-promotional readership claims without comparative statistics. The yacht/marine magazine articles only mentioned the Petitioner in passing and were not 'about' her. The videos were not about her and the platform was not shown to be major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The GreekReporter.com article relied on self-promotional readership claims without comparative statistics. The yacht/marine magazine articles only mentioned the Petitioner in passing and were not 'about' her. The videos were not about her and the platform was not shown to be major media.
original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance
AAO 为什么未被说服
Support letters lacked specific examples of how her experiential marketing approaches widely affected the industry, and the evidence did not show that her contributions had a meaningful impact on the overall field beyond her employer. The regulation requires contributions of major significance 'in the field,' not just to one employer.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Support letters lacked specific examples of how her experiential marketing approaches widely affected the industry, and the evidence did not show that her contributions had a meaningful impact on the overall field beyond her employer. The regulation requires contributions of major significance 'in the field,' not just to one employer.