AAO found the Director erred by evaluating years (2016, 2017) prior to the 2018 priority date. Since 2018 evidence was unavailable when the case was before the Director, AAO reserved final judgment and remanded for proper evaluation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director erred by evaluating years (2016, 2017) prior to the 2018 priority date. Since 2018 evidence was unavailable when the case was before the Director, AAO reserved final judgment and remanded for proper evaluation.
AAO found the Petitioner had articles published about her relating to her work in journalism in professional or major trade or major media publications.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner had articles published about her relating to her work in journalism in professional or major trade or major media publications.
AAO found the Petitioner's awards were primarily local/regional without evidence of national significance, her published articles appeared mostly in regional publications, her judging was largely for regional/municipal awards, and her television program was documented at a municipal/regional level. AAO concluded she had not established national or international acclaim and declined to reach the sustainment issue.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's awards were primarily local/regional without evidence of national significance, her published articles appeared mostly in regional publications, her judging was largely for regional/municipal awards, and her television program was documented at a municipal/regional level. AAO concluded she had not established national or international acclaim and declined to reach the sustainment issue.
AAO found the Petitioner performed a leading or critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation through her role on a television program.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner performed a leading or critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation through her role on a television program.
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
The record contains evidence showing that the Petitioner participated as a judge at an annual reports design competition. AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was met.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record contains evidence showing that the Petitioner participated as a judge at an annual reports design competition. AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was met.
AAO found that letters from orchestra directors, evidence of the Petitioner's featured role as soloist in joint concerts, and her role as concertmaster for international tours established she performed a leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that letters from orchestra directors, evidence of the Petitioner's featured role as soloist in joint concerts, and her role as concertmaster for international tours established she performed a leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations.