可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 14491–14500

EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the Petitioner demonstrated original contributions of major significance through her innovative use of SHG microscopy, development of diagnostic methods, and the documented influence of her research on other scientists and clinical practitioners worldwide.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner demonstrated original contributions of major significance through her innovative use of SHG microscopy, development of diagnostic methods, and the documented influence of her research on other scientists and clinical practitioners worldwide.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_03_B2203; source_row=24142
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports the judging criterion, noting the Petitioner has performed peer review for publications and conferences.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports the judging criterion, noting the Petitioner has performed peer review for publications and conferences.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_03_B2203; source_row=24141
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that one article constitutes a scholarly article written for learned persons in the field, and that the additional documentation submitted on appeal demonstrated Futures Daily is a professional publication, satisfying this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that one article constitutes a scholarly article written for learned persons in the field, and that the additional documentation submitted on appeal demonstrated Futures Daily is a professional publication, satisfying this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_05_B2203; source_row=24154
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Sonegawa totality-of-the-circumstances ability to pay

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the new evidence undocumented and immaterial, that solvency alone does not show capacity to pay additional wages, and that an affiliate's resources cannot be considered because the affiliate has no legal obligation to pay the wage.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the new evidence undocumented and immaterial, that solvency alone does not show capacity to pay additional wages, and that an affiliate's resources cannot be considered because the affiliate has no legal obligation to pay the wage.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_03_B5203; source_row=24145
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

裁决如何说明

AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24160
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

证据为何得到认可

AAO found in the final merits determination that the Beneficiary's Institutional Investor awards, pioneering research, scholarly articles distributed globally to thousands of clients, senior leadership roles involving multibillion dollar decisions, and high salary collectively establish sustained national or international acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found in the final merits determination that the Beneficiary's Institutional Investor awards, pioneering research, scholarly articles distributed globally to thousands of clients, senior leadership roles involving multibillion dollar decisions, and high salary collectively establish sustained national or international acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24165
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

awards

裁决如何说明

AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1, instead noting the awards evidence in the final merits determination. The awards were addressed in the final merits section as evidence of acclaim rather than as a step-1 criterion finding.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1, instead noting the awards evidence in the final merits determination. The awards were addressed in the final merits section as evidence of acclaim rather than as a step-1 criterion finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24157
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership

裁决如何说明

Petitioner conceded the membership criterion on appeal, so AAO did not address it.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner conceded the membership criterion on appeal, so AAO did not address it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24158
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Beneficiary meets the scholarly articles criterion based on his authorship of scholarly articles in the field of quantitative finance.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Beneficiary meets the scholarly articles criterion based on his authorship of scholarly articles in the field of quantitative finance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24162
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1; original contributions evidence was addressed in the final merits section.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately resolve this criterion in step 1; original contributions evidence was addressed in the final merits section.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_06_B2203; source_row=24161
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评