可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 14511–14520

NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree equivalency (bachelor's plus 5 years progressive experience)

证据为何得到认可

The new certificates specify duties and time allocations sufficient to establish 5+ years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in biomedical materials engineering and alloy development.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The new certificates specify duties and time allocations sufficient to establish 5+ years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in biomedical materials engineering and alloy development.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_02_B5203; source_row=24136
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO held that the Dhanasar prong analysis is separate from EB-2 classification eligibility, and remanded for proper analysis under prong two.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held that the Dhanasar prong analysis is separate from EB-2 classification eligibility, and remanded for proper analysis under prong two.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-25_02_B5203; source_row=24138
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found this criterion was not met for three claimed roles: the first organization's documentation related to events post-dating the petition filing; the second organization's letter did not show how the Petitioner's role was leading or critical to the overall organization; and while the Petitioner had a leading role at her own dance company, she failed to demonstrate that the company had a distinguished reputation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found this criterion was not met for three claimed roles: the first organization's documentation related to events post-dating the petition filing; the second organization's letter did not show how the Petitioner's role was leading or critical to the overall organization; and while the Petitioner had a leading role at her own dance company, she failed to demonstrate that the company had a distinguished reputation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-18_03_B2203; source_row=24122
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO overturned the Director's finding because the awards were won by the Petitioner's students or dance studios, not by the Petitioner herself. Additionally, the evidence did not demonstrate that the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO overturned the Director's finding because the awards were won by the Petitioner's students or dance studios, not by the Petitioner herself. Additionally, the evidence did not demonstrate that the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-18_03_B2203; source_row=24119
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

Petitioner did not challenge the Director's conclusion on appeal, and AAO agreed the evidence does not establish original contributions of major significance.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not challenge the Director's conclusion on appeal, and AAO agreed the evidence does not establish original contributions of major significance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-18_02_B2203; source_row=24114
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

While AAO found the organization's distinguished reputation established, the supervisor letters did not sufficiently demonstrate the importance of the Petitioner's contributions to the company's overall activities — the impact of his training, the importance of his R2R solution to one product within the company's overall portfolio, and his machine learning research had not yet made important contributions.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While AAO found the organization's distinguished reputation established, the supervisor letters did not sufficiently demonstrate the importance of the Petitioner's contributions to the company's overall activities — the impact of his training, the importance of his R2R solution to one product within the company's overall portfolio, and his machine learning research had not yet made important contributions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-18_02_B2203; source_row=24116
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

Articles announcing the contest pre-date judging and Petitioner did not submit follow-up evidence confirming he actually participated in the judging.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Articles announcing the contest pre-date judging and Petitioner did not submit follow-up evidence confirming he actually participated in the judging.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=24107
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

AAO 为什么未被说服

The recipe book does not constitute a scholarly article in a professional or major trade publication or major media.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The recipe book does not constitute a scholarly article in a professional or major trade publication or major media.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=24109
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The submitted articles and social media materials do not even mention the Petitioner's receipt of the award and do not establish national or international recognition of the award in the culinary field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted articles and social media materials do not even mention the Petitioner's receipt of the award and do not establish national or international recognition of the award in the culinary field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=24104
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

Petitioner did not show he was a member at time of filing, and regardless did not show the association requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not show he was a member at time of filing, and regardless did not show the association requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=24105
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评