Advertisements and recipes are not 'published material about the alien' in major media, and the Petitioner did not show the publications qualify as major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Advertisements and recipes are not 'published material about the alien' in major media, and the Petitioner did not show the publications qualify as major media.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdraws the Director's favorable finding because letters did not establish that the Petitioner's guest-chef and festival-hosting roles were leading or critical, nor that the organizations had distinguished reputations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdraws the Director's favorable finding because letters did not establish that the Petitioner's guest-chef and festival-hosting roles were leading or critical, nor that the organizations had distinguished reputations.
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion based on her participation as a judge at the 2015 National Talent Competition.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion based on her participation as a judge at the 2015 National Talent Competition.
AAO declined to perform the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet at least three criteria, but offered an alternative observation that the record would not support the requisite acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to perform the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet at least three criteria, but offered an alternative observation that the record would not support the requisite acclaim.
AAO declined to make a final merits determination because the initial evidentiary threshold was not met, while noting in dicta that the aggregate record would not support extraordinary ability either.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to make a final merits determination because the initial evidentiary threshold was not met, while noting in dicta that the aggregate record would not support extraordinary ability either.