AAO found that the totality of the evidence, including the petitioner's leadership, his drafting of widely-adopted documents, and his continued writing and presenting in national forums, demonstrates sustained national and international acclaim placing him among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the totality of the evidence, including the petitioner's leadership, his drafting of widely-adopted documents, and his continued writing and presenting in national forums, demonstrates sustained national and international acclaim placing him among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed with the Director that the evidence of the petitioner's presidential and leadership roles in organizations with distinguished reputations satisfies this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the evidence of the petitioner's presidential and leadership roles in organizations with distinguished reputations satisfies this criterion.
AAO found that a foreword published in e-Competitions/Concurrences and a 400-page white paper published by LexisNexis qualify as scholarly articles in the petitioner's field published in professional media. AAO rejected the director's distinction between 'legal consulting' and 'practice of law' as a basis to exclude qualifying evidence.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that a foreword published in e-Competitions/Concurrences and a 400-page white paper published by LexisNexis qualify as scholarly articles in the petitioner's field published in professional media. AAO rejected the director's distinction between 'legal consulting' and 'practice of law' as a basis to exclude qualifying evidence.
AAO agreed with the Director that the petitioner's service on judging panels for the Legal and Tax Prize and as a jury member for law firm awards satisfied this criterion.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the petitioner's service on judging panels for the Legal and Tax Prize and as a jury member for law firm awards satisfied this criterion.
New evidence on motion — a letter providing further details on the 2014 event and confirming a 2016 judging role for a fintech/startup accelerator competition — was sufficient to establish that the Petitioner meets the judging criterion.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
New evidence on motion — a letter providing further details on the 2014 event and confirming a 2016 judging role for a fintech/startup accelerator competition — was sufficient to establish that the Petitioner meets the judging criterion.
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO finds the Director failed to conduct the required balancing test under prong 3 and remands for a complete analysis, while clarifying that the Dhanasar factors are illustrative and not exhaustive.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the Director failed to conduct the required balancing test under prong 3 and remands for a complete analysis, while clarifying that the Dhanasar factors are illustrative and not exhaustive.
AAO does not reach a conclusive prong-2 determination but remands, instructing the Director to make a definitive finding on the evidence and to exclude admissibility considerations, which are beyond the scope of Dhanasar and not properly considered in an immigrant visa petition adjudication.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO does not reach a conclusive prong-2 determination but remands, instructing the Director to make a definitive finding on the evidence and to exclude admissibility considerations, which are beyond the scope of Dhanasar and not properly considered in an immigrant visa petition adjudication.