AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of at least three criteria. AAO nonetheless noted in dicta that the record did not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of at least three criteria. AAO nonetheless noted in dicta that the record did not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
Letters from performers describe advisory roles for individuals, not organizations or establishments. The company letter's claims about the company's renown and success attributable to the Petitioner are unsupported by documentary evidence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Letters from performers describe advisory roles for individuals, not organizations or establishments. The company letter's claims about the company's renown and success attributable to the Petitioner are unsupported by documentary evidence.
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination because the initial evidence requirements were not met, while alternatively noting the record would not support sustained acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination because the initial evidence requirements were not met, while alternatively noting the record would not support sustained acclaim.
AAO found that the letters submitted do not demonstrate that the Beneficiary participated as a formal judge of the work of others, and that evidence about his high-level responsibilities as Athletic Competition Leader is more relevant to the leading or critical role criterion (viii) than the judging criterion.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the letters submitted do not demonstrate that the Beneficiary participated as a formal judge of the work of others, and that evidence about his high-level responsibilities as Athletic Competition Leader is more relevant to the leading or critical role criterion (viii) than the judging criterion.
AAO held that the Beneficiary's selection to serve as sports manager for the weightlifting competition constitutes a job assignment rather than a major, internationally recognized award, which is what the regulation requires.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held that the Beneficiary's selection to serve as sports manager for the weightlifting competition constitutes a job assignment rather than a major, internationally recognized award, which is what the regulation requires.
Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the Petitioner did not present comparative statistics or other evidence demonstrating that the sports websites constitute major media, and remaining articles did not include the required date and author information.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner did not present comparative statistics or other evidence demonstrating that the sports websites constitute major media, and remaining articles did not include the required date and author information.
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that selection to plan and execute a sports event does not represent receipt of a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in the field, as the criterion requires.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that selection to plan and execute a sports event does not represent receipt of a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in the field, as the criterion requires.
AAO found that a complete ability-to-pay assessment could not be made because the 2017 tax return (covering the period from the priority date) was not in the record. The case was remanded rather than dismissed because the Director failed to request the required regulatory evidence before denying.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that a complete ability-to-pay assessment could not be made because the 2017 tax return (covering the period from the priority date) was not in the record. The case was remanded rather than dismissed because the Director failed to request the required regulatory evidence before denying.