Despite the Petitioner's claim that she submitted additional documentation on appeal, no such documentation beyond the appeal brief was provided, and the criterion remains unsatisfied.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Despite the Petitioner's claim that she submitted additional documentation on appeal, no such documentation beyond the appeal brief was provided, and the criterion remains unsatisfied.
AAO declined to consider new evidence submitted for the first time on appeal because the regulation and the RFE had put the Petitioner on notice of what was required.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to consider new evidence submitted for the first time on appeal because the regulation and the RFE had put the Petitioner on notice of what was required.
AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner could not numerically reach the required three criteria regardless of its outcome, making a ruling on this ground unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner could not numerically reach the required three criteria regardless of its outcome, making a ruling on this ground unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
AAO declined to consider new evidence submitted for the first time on appeal because the regulation and the Director's RFE had already put the Petitioner on notice of the required evidence and gave her a reasonable opportunity to provide it.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to consider new evidence submitted for the first time on appeal because the regulation and the Director's RFE had already put the Petitioner on notice of the required evidence and gave her a reasonable opportunity to provide it.
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step one, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not demonstrate the required sustained national or international acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step one, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not demonstrate the required sustained national or international acclaim.
AAO reserved the first prong as unnecessary given the prong-2 failure, but indicated in a footnote that the record does not actually demonstrate national importance and instructed the Petitioner to address this on any motion.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the first prong as unnecessary given the prong-2 failure, but indicated in a footnote that the record does not actually demonstrate national importance and instructed the Petitioner to address this on any motion.
Having found prong 2 dispositive, AAO did not separately analyze the third prong, concluding only that the Petitioner had not established eligibility for or otherwise merited a waiver as a matter of discretion.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Having found prong 2 dispositive, AAO did not separately analyze the third prong, concluding only that the Petitioner had not established eligibility for or otherwise merited a waiver as a matter of discretion.