可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 14781–14790

NIWprocedural or other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

procedural or other

timely filing of motion

AAO 为什么未被说服

The motion was filed 34 days after issuance, exceeding the 33-day mail-extended limit, and no justification for the delay was provided.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The motion was filed 34 days after issuance, exceeding the 33-day mail-extended limit, and no justification for the delay was provided.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-15_02_B5203; source_row=23829
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床50 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO concurred with the Director that the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concurred with the Director that the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-15_01_B2203; source_row=23823
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床50 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

证据为何得到认可

AAO concurred with the Director that the Petitioner met the original contributions criterion.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concurred with the Director that the Petitioner met the original contributions criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-15_01_B2203; source_row=23822
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床50 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

证据为何得到认可

AAO reversed the Director, finding that the high citation rate, expert letters documenting breakthroughs in deep brain stimulation surgery, media coverage of clinical trials, and extensive judging experience collectively established sustained acclaim and placement at the very top of the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reversed the Director, finding that the high citation rate, expert letters documenting breakthroughs in deep brain stimulation surgery, media coverage of clinical trials, and extensive judging experience collectively established sustained acclaim and placement at the very top of the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-15_01_B2203; source_row=23824
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床50 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO concurred with the Director that the Petitioner met the judging criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concurred with the Director that the Petitioner met the judging criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-15_01_B2203; source_row=23821
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments

AAO 为什么未被说服

While the Petitioner performs in a leading or critical role for the academy, the record does not demonstrate that the academy has a distinguished reputation. As to the federation, the record does not show he holds a leadership position or that his contributions are crucial to the organization's success or standing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While the Petitioner performs in a leading or critical role for the academy, the record does not demonstrate that the academy has a distinguished reputation. As to the federation, the record does not show he holds a leadership position or that his contributions are crucial to the organization's success or standing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_03_B2203; source_row=23813
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record lacks sufficient evidence that the Petitioner's wins in two amateur events are recognized outside the sponsoring organization on a national or international level. He did not show media attention or information about participants' caliber that might indicate the awards' prestige.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record lacks sufficient evidence that the Petitioner's wins in two amateur events are recognized outside the sponsoring organization on a national or international level. He did not show media attention or information about participants' caliber that might indicate the awards' prestige.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_03_B2203; source_row=23808
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner's team membership was based on amateur competition wins, and the record does not establish that those wins constitute 'outstanding achievements,' that the organization is the sole national governing body, or that the judges were recognized national or international experts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's team membership was based on amateur competition wins, and the record does not establish that those wins constitute 'outstanding achievements,' that the organization is the sole national governing body, or that the judges were recognized national or international experts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_03_B2203; source_row=23809
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

While the evidence shows the Petitioner's methods are innovative and have been adopted by some coaches, the record does not establish that they have been widely accepted or have influenced the field as a whole at a level of major significance. General praise letters without documentation of broad field-wide impact are insufficient.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While the evidence shows the Petitioner's methods are innovative and have been adopted by some coaches, the record does not establish that they have been widely accepted or have influenced the field as a whole at a level of major significance. General praise letters without documentation of broad field-wide impact are insufficient.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_03_B2203; source_row=23812
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

The totality of the record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field. His athletic and coaching accomplishments do not rise to the level of a career of acclaimed work.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The totality of the record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field. His athletic and coaching accomplishments do not rise to the level of a career of acclaimed work.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-04-09_03_B2203; source_row=23814
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评