可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 14711480

NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach prong three, as the petition failed on the national importance element of prong one.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach prong three, as the petition failed on the national importance element of prong one.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-05_01_B5203; source_row=42988
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach prong two, as the petition failed on the national importance element of prong one.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach prong two, as the petition failed on the national importance element of prong one.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-05_01_B5203; source_row=42987
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's determination in the initial appeal dismissal, and on successive motions found the Petitioner offered only vague assertions and repetition of prior arguments without demonstrating legal or policy error.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's determination in the initial appeal dismissal, and on successive motions found the Petitioner offered only vague assertions and repetition of prior arguments without demonstrating legal or policy error.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-05_01_B5203; source_row=42986
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the high salary criterion met based on the Petitioner's 2021 income tax form and compensation data showing significantly high remuneration relative to others in the architecture and urban planning field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the high salary criterion met based on the Petitioner's 2021 income tax form and compensation data showing significantly high remuneration relative to others in the architecture and urban planning field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-05_02_B2203; source_row=42991
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO found the judging criterion satisfied; the decision does not elaborate on this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO found the judging criterion satisfied; the decision does not elaborate on this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-05_02_B2203; source_row=42989
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 商业成功保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 商业成功

commercial success

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach this criterion (raised as comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4)) because the Petitioner had already overcome the basis for denial by satisfying three criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach this criterion (raised as comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4)) because the Petitioner had already overcome the basis for denial by satisfying three criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-05_02_B2203; source_row=42995
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO found the scholarly articles criterion satisfied; the decision does not elaborate on this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO found the scholarly articles criterion satisfied; the decision does not elaborate on this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-05_02_B2203; source_row=42990
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

membership in professional associations

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record lacked sufficient documentation to establish that GSCDM is a professional association, and no membership card, number, or fee payment was shown. The APA confirmation letter is dated after the petition filing date and does not establish membership at time of filing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record lacked sufficient documentation to establish that GSCDM is a professional association, and no membership card, number, or fee payment was shown. The APA confirmation letter is dated after the petition filing date and does not establish membership at time of filing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-04_01_B5203; source_row=42973
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

ten years of full-time experience

AAO 为什么未被说服

The letters of record show work as an independent contractor delivery provider and guest services host, unrelated to the occupation being sought. The new employer letter submitted on appeal post-dates the petition filing date and cannot be considered; even if considered, it does not establish ten years of full-time experience.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters of record show work as an independent contractor delivery provider and guest services host, unrelated to the occupation being sought. The new employer letter submitted on appeal post-dates the petition filing date and cannot be considered; even if considered, it does not establish ten years of full-time experience.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-04_01_B5203; source_row=42970
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

commanding salary demonstrating exceptional ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not assert and the record does not include evidence that he meets this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not assert and the record does not include evidence that he meets this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-04_01_B5203; source_row=42972
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评