Ability to pay combined proffered wages for all I-140 beneficiaries
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner's chart of 25 petitions was incomplete—USCIS records showed 59 I-140 petitions in 2017 alone—and omitted EB-2 petitions for physical therapists with higher wages. No petition status information was provided, making total obligation incalculable. Bank statements are not among the three enumerated types of evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2) and cannot demonstrate sustainable ability to pay.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's chart of 25 petitions was incomplete—USCIS records showed 59 I-140 petitions in 2017 alone—and omitted EB-2 petitions for physical therapists with higher wages. No petition status information was provided, making total obligation incalculable. Bank statements are not among the three enumerated types of evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2) and cannot demonstrate sustainable ability to pay. Future earnings projections are impermissible under Matter of Great Wall.
Ability to pay proffered wage to primary Beneficiary
AAO 为什么未被说服
The paystubs show payment at $62,400 annually, which is below the offered wage of $70,616, and do not cover the period from September 15, 2017 through July 1, 2018. The Petitioner has not established it paid the Beneficiary at least the offered wage since the priority date.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The paystubs show payment at $62,400 annually, which is below the offered wage of $70,616, and do not cover the period from September 15, 2017 through July 1, 2018. The Petitioner has not established it paid the Beneficiary at least the offered wage since the priority date.
AAO concluded the Petitioner demonstrated sustained national/international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the very top of fashion modeling.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the Petitioner demonstrated sustained national/international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the very top of fashion modeling.
labor certification supports advanced degree professional classification
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO reaffirmed that the labor certification's requirements control and that a bachelor's degree plus one year of experience does not meet the regulatory definition of an advanced degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reaffirmed that the labor certification's requirements control and that a bachelor's degree plus one year of experience does not meet the regulatory definition of an advanced degree.
beneficiary's qualifying experience under labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO cited 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) as the controlling authority requiring employer letters and found no corroborating evidence of the claimed prior employment was submitted.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO cited 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) as the controlling authority requiring employer letters and found no corroborating evidence of the claimed prior employment was submitted.
AAO agreed that the limited time devoted to research and lack of specificity about research projects rendered the research endeavor insufficient for the first prong. As to clinical and teaching duties, while they have substantial merit, the record did not establish that they would impact the broader fields of diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, or the U.S. healthcare industry beyond the patients served and trainees taught.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the limited time devoted to research and lack of specificity about research projects rendered the research endeavor insufficient for the first prong. As to clinical and teaching duties, while they have substantial merit, the record did not establish that they would impact the broader fields of diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, or the U.S. healthcare industry beyond the patients served and trainees taught.
Even assuming the research endeavor met prong one, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate she is well positioned to advance it. Her citation record lacked comparative context, article downloads did not demonstrate that her research was implemented or generated substantial interest, and she did not show her work had affected clinical practice or served as an impetus for progress in the field.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Even assuming the research endeavor met prong one, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate she is well positioned to advance it. Her citation record lacked comparative context, article downloads did not demonstrate that her research was implemented or generated substantial interest, and she did not show her work had affected clinical practice or served as an impetus for progress in the field.