可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 14851–14860

EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO deferred this evidence to the final merits determination rather than finding the criterion met at step 1, ultimately concluding that the Beneficiary had not demonstrated original contributions of major significance rising to the required level of acclaim.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO deferred this evidence to the final merits determination rather than finding the criterion met at step 1, ultimately concluding that the Beneficiary had not demonstrated original contributions of major significance rising to the required level of acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-26_01_B2203; source_row=23736
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO did not find this criterion met at step 1 but deferred the published material evidence to the final merits determination. The majority of foreign-language publications lacked proper certified translations, and the English-language publications did not establish the required level of acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not find this criterion met at step 1 but deferred the published material evidence to the final merits determination. The majority of foreign-language publications lacked proper certified translations, and the English-language publications did not establish the required level of acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-26_01_B2203; source_row=23734
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学30 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner met the judging criterion based on his service as a peer reviewer of manuscripts.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner met the judging criterion based on his service as a peer reviewer of manuscripts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-26_02_B2203; source_row=23743
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学30 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion based on his authored articles in professional publications.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion based on his authored articles in professional publications.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-26_02_B2203; source_row=23744
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学30 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the minimum three criteria at step one, though it noted the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the minimum three criteria at step one, though it noted the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-26_02_B2203; source_row=23746
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

possession of master's degree in required field of study

证据为何得到认可

AAO found a preponderance of evidence established the Beneficiary holds a foreign degree equivalent to a U.S. master's degree in Computer Science, based on an independent evaluation supported by transcripts and course analysis.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found a preponderance of evidence established the Beneficiary holds a foreign degree equivalent to a U.S. master's degree in Computer Science, based on an independent evaluation supported by transcripts and course analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-26_01_B5203; source_row=23740
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

successor-in-interest / labor certification validity

AAO 为什么未被说服

The labor certification employer survived the merger as a subsidiary of the Petitioner's parent; no rights or obligations were transferred to the Petitioner. Without showing a transfer of the predecessor's rights and obligations, the Petitioner cannot claim successor-in-interest status, rendering the labor certification invalid for this job opportunity.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification employer survived the merger as a subsidiary of the Petitioner's parent; no rights or obligations were transferred to the Petitioner. Without showing a transfer of the predecessor's rights and obligations, the Petitioner cannot claim successor-in-interest status, rendering the labor certification invalid for this job opportunity.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-26_01_B5203; source_row=23742
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

minimum qualifying experience per labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

The employer letters confirmed job title and dates but did not describe the Beneficiary's duties or experience as required. The manager's letter covered less than two years and lacked corroboration of the author's affiliation, leaving the two-year minimum unestablished.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The employer letters confirmed job title and dates but did not describe the Beneficiary's duties or experience as required. The manager's letter covered less than two years and lacked corroboration of the author's affiliation, leaving the two-year minimum unestablished.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-26_01_B5203; source_row=23741
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations

证据为何得到认可

AAO found this criterion met, concluding that the Beneficiary served in a leading or critical role as literary and production director, literary translator, and leading actor in the Petitioner's productions, and that the Petitioner has a distinguished reputation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found this criterion met, concluding that the Beneficiary served in a leading or critical role as literary and production director, literary translator, and leading actor in the Petitioner's productions, and that the Petitioner has a distinguished reputation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-26_01_B2203; source_row=23738
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO found this criterion met. The Beneficiary served as executive producer selecting the shortlist of plays for a playwriting competition.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO found this criterion met. The Beneficiary served as executive producer selecting the shortlist of plays for a playwriting competition.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-26_01_B2203; source_row=23735
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评