可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 14921–14930

NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Effect of 'any equally suitable' Kellogg language on minimum requirements

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Petitioner that adding the single word 'equally' to standard Kellogg language did not change the minimum requirements of the labor certification.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that adding the single word 'equally' to standard Kellogg language did not change the minimum requirements of the labor certification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-04_01_B5203; source_row=23669
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the Petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications and met this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications and met this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-04_02_B2203; source_row=23672
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the Petitioner served as a peer reviewer of manuscripts for a journal and met this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner served as a peer reviewer of manuscripts for a journal and met this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-04_02_B2203; source_row=23671
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found the record did not show that the Beneficiary's methods of play affected numerous others, that he introduced widely utilized techniques, or that his work otherwise represents an original contribution of major significance. The Petitioner's appeal brief did not contest the Director's findings, point to specific evidence, or offer additional arguments on this point.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the record did not show that the Beneficiary's methods of play affected numerous others, that he introduced widely utilized techniques, or that his work otherwise represents an original contribution of major significance. The Petitioner's appeal brief did not contest the Director's findings, point to specific evidence, or offer additional arguments on this point.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=23659
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found that officials' assertions that their own organization's website is major media were self-promotional and insufficient. No corroborating evidence or comparative statistics were provided to show the website's readership elevated it to major media relative to other publications.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that officials' assertions that their own organization's website is major media were self-promotional and insufficient. No corroborating evidence or comparative statistics were provided to show the website's readership elevated it to major media relative to other publications.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=23658
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found a date discrepancy between the Beneficiary's certificate and other evidence for the 2011 competition. More fundamentally, even accepting the international scope of the competitions, the record did not establish that the Beneficiary's specific certificates or standings constituted 'nationally or internationally recognized' prizes or awards for excellence in the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found a date discrepancy between the Beneficiary's certificate and other evidence for the 2011 competition. More fundamentally, even accepting the international scope of the competitions, the record did not establish that the Beneficiary's specific certificates or standings constituted 'nationally or internationally recognized' prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=23656
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO withdrew the Director's finding, determining that the ITTF Level 1 Coaching Certificate did not constitute 'membership' in an association and did not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO withdrew the Director's finding, determining that the ITTF Level 1 Coaching Certificate did not constitute 'membership' in an association and did not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. The 'First Class Athlete' credential was from a different organization than the CTTA or HJCAB whose standards were submitted, and even if those standards applied, the requirements did not rise to the level of outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=23657
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

The AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports the Beneficiary's critical role as coach and trainer for an organization with a distinguished reputation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports the Beneficiary's critical role as coach and trainer for an organization with a distinguished reputation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=23660
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary meets minimum educational requirements of offered position (foreign equivalent master's degree in speech language pathology)

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the independent evaluation was insufficient because it credited the Beneficiary with only 111 U.S. credits (not 120), and the record did not show the master's program required a four-year bachelor's for admission. The license and certifications did not specify possession of a single qualifying degree or identify which credentials were used to obtain them.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the independent evaluation was insufficient because it credited the Beneficiary with only 111 U.S. credits (not 120), and the record did not show the master's program required a four-year bachelor's for admission. The license and certifications did not specify possession of a single qualifying degree or identify which credentials were used to obtain them.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-01_01_B5203; source_row=23662
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record contained only the Petitioner's 2016 tax return, which does not cover the priority date year of 2017 or later years as required under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2).

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record contained only the Petitioner's 2016 tax return, which does not cover the priority date year of 2017 or later years as required under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2019-03-01_01_B5203; source_row=23664
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评