Beneficiary meets minimum experience requirements of the labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The employer letter confirmed employment dates and Java/J2EE experience generally but did not establish that the Beneficiary used Java and J2EE for the required 36 months, and did not clarify the nature of other positions held at that employer.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The employer letter confirmed employment dates and Java/J2EE experience generally but did not establish that the Beneficiary used Java and J2EE for the required 36 months, and did not clarify the nature of other positions held at that employer.
Only one year's tax return was submitted, covering a fiscal year beginning July 1, 2015, but there was no evidence for 2016-17 or 2017-18. Additionally, the Petitioner must also account for combined proffered wages owed under other petitions it had filed.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Only one year's tax return was submitted, covering a fiscal year beginning July 1, 2015, but there was no evidence for 2016-17 or 2017-18. Additionally, the Petitioner must also account for combined proffered wages owed under other petitions it had filed.
AAO found the Petitioner had not shown that her proposed endeavor would impact vulnerable populations at a level consistent with national importance, had not sufficiently described or documented plans for wide distribution, had not provided sufficient information about the number of individuals to be impacted, and had not shown that her financial forecasts demonstrated substantial positive economic effects on the regional o…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner had not shown that her proposed endeavor would impact vulnerable populations at a level consistent with national importance, had not sufficiently described or documented plans for wide distribution, had not provided sufficient information about the number of individuals to be impacted, and had not shown that her financial forecasts demonstrated substantial positive economic effects on the regional or national economy.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the submitted articles were from professional or major trade publications or major media. The Wikipedia citation was unreliable and did not establish major medium status, and one article lacked an author.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the submitted articles were from professional or major trade publications or major media. The Wikipedia citation was unreliable and did not establish major medium status, and one article lacked an author.
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not initially claim this criterion, and the three articles she submitted were published after the petition was filed. Eligibility must be established from the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not initially claim this criterion, and the three articles she submitted were published after the petition was filed. Eligibility must be established from the time of filing.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
Although the evidence showed the festivals and awards were sanctioned by Chinese governmental entities, the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the garnered awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, nor that the field recognizes these contests as national or international awards for excellence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the evidence showed the festivals and awards were sanctioned by Chinese governmental entities, the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the garnered awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, nor that the field recognizes these contests as national or international awards for excellence.
AAO found that despite the Petitioner's citation rankings, licensing agreements, patent, research funding, and media coverage, none of these individually or collectively demonstrated that his work had already achieved major significance in the field. Letters of support lacked specific examples and were largely conclusory, and prospective or potential impacts do not satisfy this criterion.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that despite the Petitioner's citation rankings, licensing agreements, patent, research funding, and media coverage, none of these individually or collectively demonstrated that his work had already achieved major significance in the field. Letters of support lacked specific examples and were largely conclusory, and prospective or potential impacts do not satisfy this criterion.
Although not required given the failure to meet three criteria, the AAO reviewed the totality of the record and found it insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the top of the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although not required given the failure to meet three criteria, the AAO reviewed the totality of the record and found it insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the top of the field.