Ability to pay proffered wage from priority date forward
AAO 为什么未被说服
No required documentary evidence (annual reports, tax returns, or audited financial statements) was submitted for 2017. The payroll record showed only a two-week snapshot, insufficient to establish annual ability to pay, and the W-2 confirmed total 2017 wages were actually below the proffered wage. Without regulatory required evidence, Sonegawa factors could not compensate.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
No required documentary evidence (annual reports, tax returns, or audited financial statements) was submitted for 2017. The payroll record showed only a two-week snapshot, insufficient to establish annual ability to pay, and the W-2 confirmed total 2017 wages were actually below the proffered wage. Without regulatory required evidence, Sonegawa factors could not compensate.
Beneficiary meets minimum educational requirements of offered position
AAO 为什么未被说服
Both submitted evaluations were deficient in different respects and both conflicted with EDGE's classification of the civilingenjorsexamen as equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. Additional coursework was unassessed and could not be combined to satisfy the single-degree requirement.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Both submitted evaluations were deficient in different respects and both conflicted with EDGE's classification of the civilingenjorsexamen as equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. Additional coursework was unassessed and could not be combined to satisfy the single-degree requirement.
Citation counts and high-impact journal publication did not establish major significance; recommendation letters were conclusory and did not explain how the work influenced the field; UN report inclusion did not show major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Citation counts and high-impact journal publication did not establish major significance; recommendation letters were conclusory and did not explain how the work influenced the field; UN report inclusion did not show major significance.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The articles were not about the Petitioner but about his work, and he did not submit circulation data or other corroborating evidence to show SciDev.Net qualifies as major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The articles were not about the Petitioner but about his work, and he did not submit circulation data or other corroborating evidence to show SciDev.Net qualifies as major media.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The student prize and competitive fellowships/grants were limited to students rather than open to established professionals, and Petitioner did not show they constitute nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The student prize and competitive fellowships/grants were limited to students rather than open to established professionals, and Petitioner did not show they constitute nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
Petitioner did not document his actual membership, the listed requirements (doctoral degree and five years experience) are not 'outstanding achievements,' and the second advisory role post-dated the filing date.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not document his actual membership, the listed requirements (doctoral degree and five years experience) are not 'outstanding achievements,' and the second advisory role post-dated the filing date.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
Petitioner did not document the advisory roles or distinguish his role from other advisors, the second role post-dated filing, and conferences/research/book projects are not 'organizations or establishments' under the regulation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not document the advisory roles or distinguish his role from other advisors, the second role post-dated filing, and conferences/research/book projects are not 'organizations or establishments' under the regulation.