membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
Most of the participation evidence post-dates the filing date and is excluded; the remaining 2009 invitation does not show that participation requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Most of the participation evidence post-dates the filing date and is excluded; the remaining 2009 invitation does not show that participation requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The comparable-evidence argument fails because the Petitioner has not shown the listed criteria do not readily apply to lawyers, and in any event the proffered evidence is not of the same caliber as that required by (h)(3)(ii).
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
Beneficiary meets DOL-certified educational requirement (master's degree or foreign equivalent in chemistry)
AAO 为什么未被说服
Three independent evaluations confirmed that the Beneficiary's Indian master's degree alone is only equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate; equivalency to a U.S. master's required combining the degree with work experience, which is impermissible given the labor certification explicitly excludes alternate combinations of education and experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Three independent evaluations confirmed that the Beneficiary's Indian master's degree alone is only equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate; equivalency to a U.S. master's required combining the degree with work experience, which is impermissible given the labor certification explicitly excludes alternate combinations of education and experience.
AAO found that the scholarship program's focus was to give additional professional opportunities to trainees in the field to attend an international conference, not to recognize excellence in the field, and that insufficient corroborating evidence established it as a nationally or internationally recognized award for excellence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the scholarship program's focus was to give additional professional opportunities to trainees in the field to attend an international conference, not to recognize excellence in the field, and that insufficient corroborating evidence established it as a nationally or internationally recognized award for excellence.