AAO found the book's use at universities and online visits were notable but insufficient to demonstrate an impact on the marketing field as a whole. The letter stating 85% of public university marketing courses use the content was qualified by the phrase 'in some way,' making its extent unclear.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the book's use at universities and online visits were notable but insufficient to demonstrate an impact on the marketing field as a whole. The letter stating 85% of public university marketing courses use the content was qualified by the phrase 'in some way,' making its extent unclear.
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner must compare his income with those performing similar work in his specific field as a business owner in the motorcycle/automotive industry, and the evidence failed to do so.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner must compare his income with those performing similar work in his specific field as a business owner in the motorcycle/automotive industry, and the evidence failed to do so.
AAO agreed with the director: the PGD is not an official academic record, the bachelor's-equivalent (MBA) is in business administration rather than a permitted field, and conflicting evaluations are not credible.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the director: the PGD is not an official academic record, the bachelor's-equivalent (MBA) is in business administration rather than a permitted field, and conflicting evaluations are not credible.
willful misrepresentation of Beneficiary's prior employment
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed willful misrepresentation occurred because the labor certification falsely characterized the Beneficiary as an IT Manager when the employer's letter showed she was an assistant manager in secondary market operations and corporate finance.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed willful misrepresentation occurred because the labor certification falsely characterized the Beneficiary as an IT Manager when the employer's letter showed she was an assistant manager in secondary market operations and corporate finance.
AAO agreed the Petitioner did not establish a bona fide job offer at the certified location and that unresolved material inconsistencies and fraud convictions support revocation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner did not establish a bona fide job offer at the certified location and that unresolved material inconsistencies and fraud convictions support revocation.
Salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
The record contains no evidence of the Petitioner's personal salary or remuneration. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to show that U.S. biomedical engineer wage data is an appropriate comparator, and South Korean earnings should be evaluated against South Korean wage statistics.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record contains no evidence of the Petitioner's personal salary or remuneration. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to show that U.S. biomedical engineer wage data is an appropriate comparator, and South Korean earnings should be evaluated against South Korean wage statistics.