AAO declined to separately resolve the published material criterion at step 1, noting it would consider the evidence in the final merits determination.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to separately resolve the published material criterion at step 1, noting it would consider the evidence in the final merits determination.
AAO found that the combination of the employment contract, pay statement, and salary comparison data established that the Petitioner's salary is high relative to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the combination of the employment contract, pay statement, and salary comparison data established that the Petitioner's salary is high relative to others in the field.
AAO found that while the Petitioner has been instrumental in expanding his employer's business globally and holds a high-level position, the acclaim demonstrated flows to the company rather than to him personally. Brief employment announcement articles and limited judging experience do not rise to the level of sustained national or international acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that while the Petitioner has been instrumental in expanding his employer's business globally and holds a high-level position, the acclaim demonstrated flows to the company rather than to him personally. Brief employment announcement articles and limited judging experience do not rise to the level of sustained national or international acclaim.
AAO agreed the Petitioner meets the leading or critical role criterion, based on his senior executive position, 11+ years of service, leadership of international expansion, oversight of 600 employees, and the distinguished reputation of the organization.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner meets the leading or critical role criterion, based on his senior executive position, 11+ years of service, leadership of international expansion, oversight of 600 employees, and the distinguished reputation of the organization.
AAO found the certificate from the organization regarding the Petitioner's participation as a judge for the TV Drama group sufficiently established he participated as a judge of the work of others.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the certificate from the organization regarding the Petitioner's participation as a judge for the TV Drama group sufficiently established he participated as a judge of the work of others.
AAO found the Petitioner's work has substantial merit in educating students, but her evidence did not show broader implications for the field beyond her school. A reported teacher shortage does not render an individual teacher's work nationally important under Dhanasar.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's work has substantial merit in educating students, but her evidence did not show broader implications for the field beyond her school. A reported teacher shortage does not render an individual teacher's work nationally important under Dhanasar.
Ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not begin working as a special education teacher until May 2015 and therefore could not demonstrate ten years of full-time experience at the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not begin working as a special education teacher until May 2015 and therefore could not demonstrate ten years of full-time experience at the time of filing.