可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 15211530

NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO did not address prong two, having resolved the appeal on prong one grounds.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not address prong two, having resolved the appeal on prong one grounds.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-31_02_B5203; source_row=42920
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

Because Petitioner did not raise this criterion on appeal, it is waived; the ineffective-assistance excuse is unsupported.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because Petitioner did not raise this criterion on appeal, it is waived; the ineffective-assistance excuse is unsupported.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-31_02_B2203; source_row=42916
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

证据为何得到认可

AAO previously accepted that this single criterion was met; not contested on motion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously accepted that this single criterion was met; not contested on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-31_02_B2203; source_row=42912
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high remuneration

裁决如何说明

The motion does not raise this criterion and it is therefore waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The motion does not raise this criterion and it is therefore waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-31_02_B2203; source_row=42918
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1Aprocedural or other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

procedural or other

motion to reconsider - error of law or policy

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO properly declined to consider new evidence on appeal under Matter of Soriano, the ineffective-assistance claim is unsupported, and the Petitioner does not specify what law or policy was incorrectly applied.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO properly declined to consider new evidence on appeal under Matter of Soriano, the ineffective-assistance claim is unsupported, and the Petitioner does not specify what law or policy was incorrectly applied.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-31_02_B2203; source_row=42911
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1Aprocedural or other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

procedural or other

motion to reopen - new facts

AAO 为什么未被说服

The new evidence and ineffective-assistance claims do not meet the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2); the affidavit contains unresolved discrepancies, O-T- explicitly identified herself as a non-attorney, and the additional evidence on the membership, published-material, and judging criteria is insufficient to change the outcome.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The new evidence and ineffective-assistance claims do not meet the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2); the affidavit contains unresolved discrepancies, O-T- explicitly identified herself as a non-attorney, and the additional evidence on the membership, published-material, and judging criteria is insufficient to change the outcome.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-31_02_B2203; source_row=42910
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others in the field

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved this issue under Bagamasbad because even if met, Petitioner would have only two criteria, short of the required three. AAO also flagged numerous unresolved inconsistencies between the original refereeing book and its translation that undermine the evidence.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this issue under Bagamasbad because even if met, Petitioner would have only two criteria, short of the required three. AAO also flagged numerous unresolved inconsistencies between the original refereeing book and its translation that undermine the evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-31_02_B2203; source_row=42915
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations

裁决如何说明

Issue waived because not raised on appeal; ineffective-assistance excuse is unsupported.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Issue waived because not raised on appeal; ineffective-assistance excuse is unsupported.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-31_02_B2203; source_row=42917
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others in the field

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner demonstrated participation as a judge of the work of others in the field.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner demonstrated participation as a judge of the work of others in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-31_01_B2203; source_row=42905
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to fully reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria. However, AAO noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not show the required sustained national or international acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to fully reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria. However, AAO noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not show the required sustained national or international acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-31_01_B2203; source_row=42909
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评