可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 15341–15350

NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床学士

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer/labor certification

裁决如何说明

AAO declines to reach prong 3 because failure on prong 2 is dispositive of the waiver claim.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declines to reach prong 3 because failure on prong 2 is dispositive of the waiver claim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-22_01_B5203; source_row=23182
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床学士

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

证据为何得到认可

AAO concludes that the proposed clinical research investigating Tibetan herbs for MS treatment has both substantial merit and national importance based on the dissemination of results and broader implications for MS treatment, though supervisory/patient-processing duties alone would not meet national importance.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concludes that the proposed clinical research investigating Tibetan herbs for MS treatment has both substantial merit and national importance based on the dissemination of results and broader implications for MS treatment, though supervisory/patient-processing duties alone would not meet national importance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-22_01_B5203; source_row=23180
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

other

labor certification expiration before petition filing

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO finds the labor certification appears to have expired because it was not filed with a petition within 180 days of its December 4, 2009 grant; the Petitioner asserted timely filing but did not document it.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the labor certification appears to have expired because it was not filed with a petition within 180 days of its December 4, 2009 grant; the Petitioner asserted timely filing but did not document it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-19_01_B5203; source_row=23179
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that while the proposed endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner did not show his specific consulting role would have national importance; the broader economic effects of client projects were not attributable to his work, and his work would not impact the financial engineering field or U.S. economy more broadly.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that while the proposed endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner did not show his specific consulting role would have national importance; the broader economic effects of client projects were not attributable to his work, and his work would not impact the financial engineering field or U.S. economy more broadly.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B5203; source_row=23176
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach prong two because the failure on prong one was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach prong two because the failure on prong one was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B5203; source_row=23177
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach prong three because the failure on prong one was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach prong three because the failure on prong one was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B5203; source_row=23178
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学博士后

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the citation record, expert testimony, and judging activity together demonstrated sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the citation record, expert testimony, and judging activity together demonstrated sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B2203; source_row=23175
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学博士后

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the Petitioner has made original scientific contributions to stretchable electronics that are of major significance.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner has made original scientific contributions to stretchable electronics that are of major significance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B2203; source_row=23173
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学博士后

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the Petitioner authored articles in professional publications such as Scientific Reports and Nano Letters.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner authored articles in professional publications such as Scientific Reports and Nano Letters.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B2203; source_row=23174
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

材料科学博士后

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the Petitioner edited articles for journals such as Nanoscale Research Letters and Nanotechnology.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner edited articles for journals such as Nanoscale Research Letters and Nanotechnology.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B2203; source_row=23172
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评