AAO found the record lacked evidence the Petitioner trained the named dancers, and even if it had, the show's commercial success could not be attributed to her given the many performers and personnel involved over 20+ years.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the record lacked evidence the Petitioner trained the named dancers, and even if it had, the show's commercial success could not be attributed to her given the many performers and personnel involved over 20+ years.
AAO found district court decisions are not binding, and that the cited cases do not support Petitioner's claim. Articles about a school or championship are not 'about' the Petitioner; new circulation evidence cannot be considered on a motion to reconsider.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found district court decisions are not binding, and that the cited cases do not support Petitioner's claim. Articles about a school or championship are not 'about' the Petitioner; new circulation evidence cannot be considered on a motion to reconsider.
AAO held on appeal (prior to this motion) that the evidence regarding the Petitioner's activity on the audition team panel for a Nigerian modeling agency was sufficient to meet criterion (iv). This finding was not disturbed on motion.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held on appeal (prior to this motion) that the evidence regarding the Petitioner's activity on the audition team panel for a Nigerian modeling agency was sufficient to meet criterion (iv). This finding was not disturbed on motion.
On the prior appeal, AAO determined Petitioner played a critical role as head coach and choreographer for the school, disagreeing with the Director on this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
On the prior appeal, AAO determined Petitioner played a critical role as head coach and choreographer for the school, disagreeing with the Director on this criterion.
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed breast cancer research has substantial merit, and that his evidence of broader impact through dissemination of results via journals and conferences satisfies the national importance requirement.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed breast cancer research has substantial merit, and that his evidence of broader impact through dissemination of results via journals and conferences satisfies the national importance requirement.
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that the Petitioner's track record of successful research and the significance of his ongoing breast cancer treatment studies show that his contributions are of such value that, on balance, they would benefit the United States even assuming other qualified U.S. workers are available.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's track record of successful research and the significance of his ongoing breast cancer treatment studies show that his contributions are of such value that, on balance, they would benefit the United States even assuming other qualified U.S. workers are available.
AAO found that the Petitioner's education, publications, citation record, and colleagues' testimony demonstrate a track record of successful research and position him well to advance his proposed breast cancer research in the United States.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's education, publications, citation record, and colleagues' testimony demonstrate a track record of successful research and position him well to advance his proposed breast cancer research in the United States.
Labor certification demonstrates need for advanced-degree professional
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed with the Director that Part H.14 of the labor certification expressly accepts a bachelor's degree plus professional registration, failing to satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4)(i). The Petitioner's request to correct this as a clerical error is barred by DOL regulations prohibiting post-submission modifications.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that Part H.14 of the labor certification expressly accepts a bachelor's degree plus professional registration, failing to satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4)(i). The Petitioner's request to correct this as a clerical error is barred by DOL regulations prohibiting post-submission modifications. The submitted advertisements also did not establish they described the same position as the labor certification.