published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
证据为何得到认可
On appeal, new letters confirmed that the two radio stations are major Russian radio stations with millions of daily listeners, and that one is the largest in the Russian Federation. This establishes that the Petitioner was interviewed by major Russian media discussing her work as a choreographer.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
On appeal, new letters confirmed that the two radio stations are major Russian radio stations with millions of daily listeners, and that one is the largest in the Russian Federation. This establishes that the Petitioner was interviewed by major Russian media discussing her work as a choreographer.
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
证据为何得到认可
AAO found the Director applied an improperly high 'clear and convincing' standard rather than the preponderance of the evidence standard. Under the correct standard, the evidence of awards won by the school at festivals and competitions established by a preponderance that the school has a distinguished reputation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director applied an improperly high 'clear and convincing' standard rather than the preponderance of the evidence standard. Under the correct standard, the evidence of awards won by the school at festivals and competitions established by a preponderance that the school has a distinguished reputation.
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
证据为何得到认可
AAO found sufficient evidence that the Petitioner acted as choreographer for dance groups that performed at various festivals, competitions and concerts, and that choreography constitutes 'the art of creating and arranging dances,' qualifying as display of artistic work.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found sufficient evidence that the Petitioner acted as choreographer for dance groups that performed at various festivals, competitions and concerts, and that choreography constitutes 'the art of creating and arranging dances,' qualifying as display of artistic work.
fully describe and document the transfer and assumption of ownership
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner declined to provide the quarterly federal employment tax returns requested by AAO, which would have demonstrated the employee transfer. The income tax returns submitted do not show individual employee information. Additionally, inconsistencies in the paychecks and W-2 records (issued by a different entity than the purported predecessor) were not resolved with independent objective evidence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner declined to provide the quarterly federal employment tax returns requested by AAO, which would have demonstrated the employee transfer. The income tax returns submitted do not show individual employee information. Additionally, inconsistencies in the paychecks and W-2 records (issued by a different entity than the purported predecessor) were not resolved with independent objective evidence.
The Petitioner failed to establish that his contributions were original or of major significance in the field. His role in drafting a code was not individually identified; letters from recommenders were conclusory and field-specific to China rather than the broader real estate field; citation analysis was deemed more relevant to a final merits determination; and conference participation alone does not demonstrate original c…
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to establish that his contributions were original or of major significance in the field. His role in drafting a code was not individually identified; letters from recommenders were conclusory and field-specific to China rather than the broader real estate field; citation analysis was deemed more relevant to a final merits determination; and conference participation alone does not demonstrate original contributions of major significance.
The Petitioner's salary and total compensation, even including a housing allowance and a subsequent raise to $60,000/year, remained below the Level 2 wage benchmark for athletes and sports competitors in his area. The Petitioner also failed to submit salary data specific to badminton players.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's salary and total compensation, even including a housing allowance and a subsequent raise to $60,000/year, remained below the Level 2 wage benchmark for athletes and sports competitors in his area. The Petitioner also failed to submit salary data specific to badminton players.