commercial successes in the performing arts (comparable evidence)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate eligibility to use comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4) because he did not show why he could not satisfy at least three of the ten standard criteria. Moreover, his player rankings were not truly comparable to commercial successes, being more analogous to the awards criterion he already satisfied.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate eligibility to use comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4) because he did not show why he could not satisfy at least three of the ten standard criteria. Moreover, his player rankings were not truly comparable to commercial successes, being more analogous to the awards criterion he already satisfied.
high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not resolve inconsistencies between the salary amounts reported by his employer ($84,615) and those reported to the Azerbaijan government ($40,000), and the comparative salary data provided was insufficient to establish that his earnings were high in relation to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not resolve inconsistencies between the salary amounts reported by his employer ($84,615) and those reported to the Azerbaijan government ($40,000), and the comparative salary data provided was insufficient to establish that his earnings were high in relation to others in the field.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The promotional material and letters do not show that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and no other evidence demonstrates such recognition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The promotional material and letters do not show that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and no other evidence demonstrates such recognition.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
Without the association bylaws, the Petitioner failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that the associations require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. The failure to submit requested evidence that precludes a material line of inquiry is grounds for denial.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Without the association bylaws, the Petitioner failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that the associations require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. The failure to submit requested evidence that precludes a material line of inquiry is grounds for denial.
The record reflects that the Petitioner served as a peer reviewer of manuscripts for journals and at conferences. AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was satisfied.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record reflects that the Petitioner served as a peer reviewer of manuscripts for journals and at conferences. AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was satisfied.
AAO did not reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria. In advisory dicta, AAO noted the record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria. In advisory dicta, AAO noted the record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
AAO declined to reach final merits because the Petitioner did not meet the initial threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not demonstrate the required sustained national or international acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach final merits because the Petitioner did not meet the initial threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not demonstrate the required sustained national or international acclaim.