advanced degree professional / labor certification minimum education
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO went further than the Director, identifying conflicting diploma and transcript evidence between this proceeding and the Beneficiary's earlier F-1 visa application. Because the Petitioner did not respond to AAO's NOID/RFE, the authenticity of the documents and the field of study were not established.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO went further than the Director, identifying conflicting diploma and transcript evidence between this proceeding and the Beneficiary's earlier F-1 visa application. Because the Petitioner did not respond to AAO's NOID/RFE, the authenticity of the documents and the field of study were not established.
AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and that the supporting letters demonstrate potential prospective impact in advancing stroke prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, satisfying prong one.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and that the supporting letters demonstrate potential prospective impact in advancing stroke prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, satisfying prong one.
The article in which the Petitioner provided a quote does not constitute published material about him. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to establish that the publication is a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The article in which the Petitioner provided a quote does not constitute published material about him. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to establish that the publication is a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.
The Petitioner's inventions were adopted by only a few companies without evidence of field-wide impact. Recommendation letters were conclusory and lacked specific details about the significance of his contributions. Conference invitations alone do not establish original contributions of major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's inventions were adopted by only a few companies without evidence of field-wide impact. Recommendation letters were conclusory and lacked specific details about the significance of his contributions. Conference invitations alone do not establish original contributions of major significance.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
Although the record showed the Petitioner is owner or part-owner of two companies and likely performed a leading role, he did not claim or establish that these organizations have distinguished reputations marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the record showed the Petitioner is owner or part-owner of two companies and likely performed a leading role, he did not claim or establish that these organizations have distinguished reputations marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence.
The submitted screenshots either were not primarily about the Petitioner, lacked required date or author information, or were not supported by documentation establishing the websites as professional or major trade publications or other major media. AAO affirmed the Director's finding that this criterion was not met.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted screenshots either were not primarily about the Petitioner, lacked required date or author information, or were not supported by documentation establishing the websites as professional or major trade publications or other major media. AAO affirmed the Director's finding that this criterion was not met.
Ability to pay proffered wage accounting for multiple sponsored beneficiaries
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner's 2016 financials show sufficient net income and net current assets in isolation, but USCIS records reveal multiple simultaneous immigrant petitions. The Petitioner must show ability to pay the combined proffered wages of all co-pending petitions, which the current record does not establish.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's 2016 financials show sufficient net income and net current assets in isolation, but USCIS records reveal multiple simultaneous immigrant petitions. The Petitioner must show ability to pay the combined proffered wages of all co-pending petitions, which the current record does not establish.
Beneficiary possesses degree in labor-certification-required field of study
AAO 为什么未被说服
The labor certification plainly lists acceptable fields and states no alternate fields are acceptable. The Beneficiary's degree in 'computer applications' does not match any listed field. The Petitioner's sub-discipline argument is unavailing because the certification as written does not support acceptance of sub-disciplines or related fields.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification plainly lists acceptable fields and states no alternate fields are acceptable. The Beneficiary's degree in 'computer applications' does not match any listed field. The Petitioner's sub-discipline argument is unavailing because the certification as written does not support acceptance of sub-disciplines or related fields.