可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 15701–15710

EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record did not contain sufficient objective evidence to attribute the organizations' financial results directly to the Petitioner's work, and did not establish that the organizations had distinguished reputations in their industries.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record did not contain sufficient objective evidence to attribute the organizations' financial results directly to the Petitioner's work, and did not establish that the organizations had distinguished reputations in their industries.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_03_B2203; source_row=22785
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

AAO 为什么未被说服

While the Petitioner demonstrated exemplary decision-making in risk assessments and audits, this does not constitute judging the work of others as an objective observer determining one's level of expertise.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While the Petitioner demonstrated exemplary decision-making in risk assessments and audits, this does not constitute judging the work of others as an objective observer determining one's level of expertise.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_03_B2203; source_row=22783
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not point to any evidence confirming his prizes or awards were recognized on a national or international level.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not point to any evidence confirming his prizes or awards were recognized on a national or international level.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_02_B2203; source_row=22774
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not discuss any documents establishing that he judged the work of others in photography or an allied field.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not discuss any documents establishing that he judged the work of others in photography or an allied field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_02_B2203; source_row=22776
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or significantly high remuneration

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not identify documents confirming his high salary or significantly high remuneration as compared to others in the field of photography.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not identify documents confirming his high salary or significantly high remuneration as compared to others in the field of photography.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_02_B2203; source_row=22780
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not reference documentation showing how he became a member of any organizations or that the entities required outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized national or international experts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not reference documentation showing how he became a member of any organizations or that the entities required outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized national or international experts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_02_B2203; source_row=22775
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments

AAO 为什么未被说服

The criterion requires a leading or critical role for a qualifying organization or establishment, and the Petitioner did not show that the entity in question constituted such an organization or establishment.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The criterion requires a leading or critical role for a qualifying organization or establishment, and the Petitioner did not show that the entity in question constituted such an organization or establishment.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_02_B2203; source_row=22779
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

Although the record showed the Petitioner was an experienced photographer, it did not illustrate that he had made contributions of major significance in the field.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the record showed the Petitioner was an experienced photographer, it did not illustrate that he had made contributions of major significance in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_02_B2203; source_row=22777
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the judging criterion on motion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the judging criterion on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_01_B2203; source_row=22766
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the awards criterion on motion; the claim was not substantiated with new facts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the awards criterion on motion; the claim was not substantiated with new facts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_01_B2203; source_row=22763
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评