可追溯来源的裁决研究
从大量个案裁决理由中检索，再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。
本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录，而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误；标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率，也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。
10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定
当前显示 15711–15720
案件事实
审查的问题
display
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the display criterion on motion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the display criterion on motion.
案件事实
审查的问题
published material
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the published material criterion on motion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the published material criterion on motion.
案件事实
审查的问题
contributions of major significance
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the contributions of major significance criterion on motion.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the contributions of major significance criterion on motion.
案件事实
审查的问题
membership
AAO 为什么未被说服
The bylaws showed that membership requires nomination by two existing members and certain educational or experiential backgrounds in chemical sciences, but this does not demonstrate that outstanding achievements are required for membership.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The bylaws showed that membership requires nomination by two existing members and certain educational or experiential backgrounds in chemical sciences, but this does not demonstrate that outstanding achievements are required for membership.
案件事实
审查的问题
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
证据为何得到认可
AAO found in its prior appeal decision that the Petitioner met criterion (vii) for display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, the only criterion found met.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO found in its prior appeal decision that the Petitioner met criterion (vii) for display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, the only criterion found met.
案件事实
审查的问题
scholarly articles
证据为何得到认可
AAO had previously found the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion; this finding was not disturbed on motion.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
AAO had previously found the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion; this finding was not disturbed on motion.
案件事实
审查的问题
continuing ability to pay proffered wage
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the record lacked the required documentary categories for 2016, that 2014 and 2015 audited statements showed negative net income and net current assets, and that ability to pay multiple petitions was not established.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO found the record lacked the required documentary categories for 2016, that 2014 and 2015 audited statements showed negative net income and net current assets, and that ability to pay multiple petitions was not established.
案件事实
审查的问题
offered position remains the same as on labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the change in primary worksite from Massachusetts to California changed the prevailing wage by nearly $20,000 and could have affected recruitment of U.S. workers, so the job opportunity is not the same.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO found the change in primary worksite from Massachusetts to California changed the prevailing wage by nearly $20,000 and could have affected recruitment of U.S. workers, so the job opportunity is not the same.
案件事实
审查的问题
Beneficiary's possession of DOL-certified experience and special skills by priority date
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the company letter confirmed only title and dates, not duties or skills, and the manager's letter lacked corroboration of his affiliation with the former employer, so the Beneficiary's qualifying experience was not established.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO found the company letter confirmed only title and dates, not duties or skills, and the manager's letter lacked corroboration of his affiliation with the former employer, so the Beneficiary's qualifying experience was not established.
案件事实
审查的问题
timing of acquisition relative to labor certification filing
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO held neither USCIS nor DOL policy permits successorship based on an acquisition that occurred more than three years before the labor certification's filing, and that the record does not establish the labor certification employer's intention to employ the Beneficiary as of the certification application's filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO held neither USCIS nor DOL policy permits successorship based on an acquisition that occurred more than three years before the labor certification's filing, and that the record does not establish the labor certification employer's intention to employ the Beneficiary as of the certification application's filing.