可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 15791–15800

EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

The reference letter's assertion about membership requirements lacked specificity and was not corroborated. The submitted FILA regulations document did not address membership requirements, and the record lacked evidence that recognized experts judge prospective members' achievements.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The reference letter's assertion about membership requirements lacked specificity and was not corroborated. The submitted FILA regulations document did not address membership requirements, and the record lacked evidence that recognized experts judge prospective members' achievements.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22681
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

Original contributions of major significance in the field

AAO 为什么未被说服

Using a coaching technique based on a well-established Georgian wrestling style does not constitute an original contribution, and there was no evidence the technique had any impact beyond the Petitioner's own students.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Using a coaching technique based on a well-established Georgian wrestling style does not constitute an original contribution, and there was no evidence the technique had any impact beyond the Petitioner's own students.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22684
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 重大国际奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 重大国际奖项

One-time major internationally recognized award

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not establish receipt of a major, internationally recognized award, so the analysis proceeded to the ten criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not establish receipt of a major, internationally recognized award, so the analysis proceeded to the ten criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22679
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record did not establish the Petitioner performed as a referee for the claimed organization, did not confirm an official coaching capacity, and conflicting letters described his role differently (volunteer coach, consultant, sparring partner). No evidence established the organization had a distinguished reputation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record did not establish the Petitioner performed as a referee for the claimed organization, did not confirm an official coaching capacity, and conflicting letters described his role differently (volunteer coach, consultant, sparring partner). No evidence established the organization had a distinguished reputation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22686
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

Final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record would not support extraordinary ability.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record would not support extraordinary ability.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22687
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

Participation as a judge of the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

While the Petitioner held an International Referee card, the record did not demonstrate he had actually performed as a referee for the claimed organization, and a supporting letter did not mention his referee service. The record also lacked explanation of how referee duties qualify under this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While the Petitioner held an International Referee card, the record did not demonstrate he had actually performed as a referee for the claimed organization, and a supporting letter did not mention his referee service. The record also lacked explanation of how referee duties qualify under this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22683
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

证据为何得到认可

The record establishes that the Petitioner won multiple first, second, and third place finishes at national-level wrestling competitions, and the translation certifications met regulatory requirements. AAO disagreed with the Director's finding on this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record establishes that the Petitioner won multiple first, second, and third place finishes at national-level wrestling competitions, and the translation certifications met regulatory requirements. AAO disagreed with the Director's finding on this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22680
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner provided only a 2015 tax return, but the priority date is June 17, 2016, so evidence of ability to pay for 2016 and later years was required. Additionally, USCIS records indicated multiple concurrent immigrant petitions, requiring demonstration of ability to pay combined proffered wages.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner provided only a 2015 tax return, but the priority date is June 17, 2016, so evidence of ability to pay for 2016 and later years was required. Additionally, USCIS records indicated multiple concurrent immigrant petitions, requiring demonstration of ability to pay combined proffered wages.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-24_01_B5203; source_row=22678
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary possession of required degree in acceptable field

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that neither evaluation supported possession of a qualifying degree in computer science or the other accepted fields. The education-only evaluation concluded only a business administration equivalency, which is not listed on the labor certification, and the petitioner's own evaluations contradicted its claim that the Beneficiary had a computer science degree equivalent.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that neither evaluation supported possession of a qualifying degree in computer science or the other accepted fields. The education-only evaluation concluded only a business administration equivalency, which is not listed on the labor certification, and the petitioner's own evaluations contradicted its claim that the Beneficiary had a computer science degree equivalent.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-24_01_B5203; source_row=22677
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the producer's letter did not specify what the Petitioner actually did at the event and thus did not establish a leading or critical role; the petitioner's appellate claim that she performed the role yearly contradicted the letter, and the organization's distinguished reputation was not demonstrated.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the producer's letter did not specify what the Petitioner actually did at the event and thus did not establish a leading or critical role; the petitioner's appellate claim that she performed the role yearly contradicted the letter, and the organization's distinguished reputation was not demonstrated.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-17_01_B2203; source_row=22668
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评