single foreign equivalent degree to U.S. baccalaureate plus five years progressive experience
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed that the credential evaluations relied on a 3-for-1 experience-to-education equivalence applicable only to H-1B nonimmigrant cases, not immigrant petitions, and that work experience cannot substitute for a single foreign equivalent degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the credential evaluations relied on a 3-for-1 experience-to-education equivalence applicable only to H-1B nonimmigrant cases, not immigrant petitions, and that work experience cannot substitute for a single foreign equivalent degree.
The financial statements were not independently audited, making them likely management representations that lack the reliability of audited statements or tax returns signed under penalty of perjury.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The financial statements were not independently audited, making them likely management representations that lack the reliability of audited statements or tax returns signed under penalty of perjury.
The Petitioner did not establish that the bank funds represent unconsidered net current assets separate from those already reflected on the 2015 tax return, so they do not add anything to the ability-to-pay analysis.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not establish that the bank funds represent unconsidered net current assets separate from those already reflected on the 2015 tax return, so they do not add anything to the ability-to-pay analysis.
Beneficiary possession of required experience by priority date
AAO 为什么未被说服
Only 16 months of experience was documented from one former employer. The second employer's experience lacked a proper verification letter, and the coworker affidavit lacked independent corroboration. The Petitioner's own employment of the Beneficiary could not be counted without proof of a substantially different position or impracticality of training. The combined documented experience fell short of three years.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Only 16 months of experience was documented from one former employer. The second employer's experience lacked a proper verification letter, and the coworker affidavit lacked independent corroboration. The Petitioner's own employment of the Beneficiary could not be counted without proof of a substantially different position or impracticality of training. The combined documented experience fell short of three years.
The record does not include documentation of accounts receivable to corroborate the CFO's claim. The CFO's omission of over $2.7 million in current liabilities was unsupported, and the claim that those liabilities were not due within a year contradicts how they were categorized on the tax returns.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record does not include documentation of accounts receivable to corroborate the CFO's claim. The CFO's omission of over $2.7 million in current liabilities was unsupported, and the claim that those liabilities were not due within a year contradicts how they were categorized on the tax returns.
Although the Petitioner has been in business since 1992 and had 91 employees with slight revenue growth, it did not demonstrate uncharacteristic losses or expenses, an outstanding industry reputation, or the Beneficiary's replacement of a current employee, as present in Sonegawa. The need to cover multiple beneficiaries' wages further distinguishes the case.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Petitioner has been in business since 1992 and had 91 employees with slight revenue growth, it did not demonstrate uncharacteristic losses or expenses, an outstanding industry reputation, or the Beneficiary's replacement of a current employee, as present in Sonegawa. The need to cover multiple beneficiaries' wages further distinguishes the case.
Ability to pay combined proffered wages of multiple beneficiaries
AAO 为什么未被说服
USCIS records show the Petitioner filed multiple I-140 petitions. The Petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay the combined proffered wages of this and other applicable petitions, but failed to provide the required documentation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
USCIS records show the Petitioner filed multiple I-140 petitions. The Petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay the combined proffered wages of this and other applicable petitions, but failed to provide the required documentation.
Successor in interest / labor certification validity
AAO 为什么未被说服
The bill of sale did not specify assets acquired, and the record failed to establish the company's acquisition of the rights and obligations necessary to continue the Petitioner's business, or that the job opportunity was unchanged, or that the successor could pay the proffered wage.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The bill of sale did not specify assets acquired, and the record failed to establish the company's acquisition of the rights and obligations necessary to continue the Petitioner's business, or that the job opportunity was unchanged, or that the successor could pay the proffered wage.
The Petitioner's tax returns for 2014 and 2015 reflect negative net income and negative net current assets, which do not demonstrate ability to pay the shortfall in either year.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's tax returns for 2014 and 2015 reflect negative net income and negative net current assets, which do not demonstrate ability to pay the shortfall in either year.