AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the criterion does not require employment, disagreeing with the Director's employee requirement. However, AAO still found the criterion not met because the contractors' letters lacked sufficient detail to show the Petitioner's contributions were of significant importance to the organizations' overall activities, and only one contractor was found to have a distinguished reputation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the criterion does not require employment, disagreeing with the Director's employee requirement. However, AAO still found the criterion not met because the contractors' letters lacked sufficient detail to show the Petitioner's contributions were of significant importance to the organizations' overall activities, and only one contractor was found to have a distinguished reputation.
AAO found the Petitioner's claimed cybersecurity role was contradicted by evidence showing he works on internal IT infrastructure for a paper-based packaging manufacturer, which does not demonstrate he is well positioned to advance the overall field of cybersecurity.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's claimed cybersecurity role was contradicted by evidence showing he works on internal IT infrastructure for a paper-based packaging manufacturer, which does not demonstrate he is well positioned to advance the overall field of cybersecurity.
foreign equivalent of U.S. bachelor's degree with five years progressive experience
AAO 为什么未被说服
The new evaluation still does not explain how two years of study equals four years required for a U.S. bachelor's degree, and conflicts with the first evaluation without satisfactory explanation. No document in the record bears the title 'Título de Licenciatura' that the new evaluation references.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The new evaluation still does not explain how two years of study equals four years required for a U.S. bachelor's degree, and conflicts with the first evaluation without satisfactory explanation. No document in the record bears the title 'Título de Licenciatura' that the new evaluation references.
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements
裁决如何说明
The Petitioner never addressed the Director's third-prong findings on appeal or on the combined motions, so AAO deemed the issue waived and treated it as a dispositive basis for dismissing the motion to reconsider.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner never addressed the Director's third-prong findings on appeal or on the combined motions, so AAO deemed the issue waived and treated it as a dispositive basis for dismissing the motion to reconsider.
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
裁决如何说明
AAO found the Director's final merits determination procedurally defective for failing to consider highly probative evidence—namely the Beneficiary's five U.S. patents and product/business contributions—and remanded for a new determination rather than issuing its own finding.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's final merits determination procedurally defective for failing to consider highly probative evidence—namely the Beneficiary's five U.S. patents and product/business contributions—and remanded for a new determination rather than issuing its own finding.