可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 16011–16020

EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the record shows the Petitioner participated as a judge for a competition, satisfying this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the record shows the Petitioner participated as a judge for a competition, satisfying this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-06_01_B2203; source_row=22436
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

other

qualifying experience required by labor certification

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the letter described duties consistent with the labor certification and established the Beneficiary met the three-month international refugee law experience requirement. This issue was first raised by AAO in its prior dismissal, not by the Director.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the letter described duties consistent with the labor certification and established the Beneficiary met the three-month international refugee law experience requirement. This issue was first raised by AAO in its prior dismissal, not by the Director.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-05_01_B5203; source_row=22434
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

other

continuing ability to pay the proffered wage

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the new evidence established by a preponderance of the evidence that the Petitioner could pay the wage difference in the years in question.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the new evidence established by a preponderance of the evidence that the Petitioner could pay the wage difference in the years in question.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-05_01_B5203; source_row=22433
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

The employer letter showed positive customer service but did not establish the Petitioner's measurable impact on the organization. The record also did not establish that the establishment has a distinguished reputation or quantify business growth attributable to the Petitioner.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The employer letter showed positive customer service but did not establish the Petitioner's measurable impact on the organization. The record also did not establish that the establishment has a distinguished reputation or quantify business growth attributable to the Petitioner.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-28_01_B2203; source_row=22424
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed with the Director that the competition award was not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. The Appeal-stage Award of Excellence also lacked evidence of national recognition, and the significance of the trophy photograph was unexplained.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the competition award was not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. The Appeal-stage Award of Excellence also lacked evidence of national recognition, and the significance of the trophy photograph was unexplained.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-28_01_B2203; source_row=22422
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

other

beneficiary meets labor certification experience requirement by priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

Although the Director did not address the issue, AAO found on de novo review that the Beneficiary could only establish four years and eight months of qualifying experience — less than the five years required — because several employment letters lacked specific duty descriptions and one employer provided no letter at all.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Director did not address the issue, AAO found on de novo review that the Beneficiary could only establish four years and eight months of qualifying experience — less than the five years required — because several employment letters lacked specific duty descriptions and one employer provided no letter at all.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-28_01_B5203; source_row=22427
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner failed to provide regulatory-required evidence for 2016 (the 2015 return was insufficient and the 2016 return was never received), and the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances factors were unsupported because the record lacked evidence of business growth, losses, reputation, and staffing context.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to provide regulatory-required evidence for 2016 (the 2015 return was insufficient and the 2016 return was never received), and the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances factors were unsupported because the record lacked evidence of business growth, losses, reputation, and staffing context.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-28_01_B5203; source_row=22426
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO concurred that peer review activity satisfied the judging criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concurred that peer review activity satisfied the judging criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-28_02_B2203; source_row=22428
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO concurred that the Petitioner satisfied the authorship of scholarly articles criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concurred that the Petitioner satisfied the authorship of scholarly articles criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-28_02_B2203; source_row=22430
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

证据为何得到认可

AAO concurred that the Petitioner made original contributions of major significance.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concurred that the Petitioner made original contributions of major significance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-28_02_B2203; source_row=22429
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评