可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 16051–16060

NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the projected metrics — including 1%-2% profit margins, payroll taxes, and a planned headcount of 17 employees — did not demonstrate substantial economic effects extending beyond the company to the regional or national economy. Benefits to overseas markets are not germane, and the Petitioner failed to corroborate his claims about supplier and shipping-industry impacts.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the projected metrics — including 1%-2% profit margins, payroll taxes, and a planned headcount of 17 employees — did not demonstrate substantial economic effects extending beyond the company to the regional or national economy. Benefits to overseas markets are not germane, and the Petitioner failed to corroborate his claims about supplier and shipping-industry impacts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_01_B5203; source_row=22390
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

Because the first prong was not met, AAO declined to reach the third prong's balancing analysis.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the first prong was not met, AAO declined to reach the third prong's balancing analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_01_B5203; source_row=22392
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to fully conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step one, but noted the record would not support the required finding even if step one were met.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to fully conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step one, but noted the record would not support the required finding even if step one were met.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_02_B2203; source_row=22397
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

awards

证据为何得到认可

The record indicates the Petitioner placed first in the male category at the 2014 race, satisfying this criterion. AAO concurred with the Director.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record indicates the Petitioner placed first in the male category at the 2014 race, satisfying this criterion. AAO concurred with the Director.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_06_B2203; source_row=22415
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

电子 / 电气工程64 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO concurred with the Director's finding that the Petitioner met the authorship of scholarly articles criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concurred with the Director's finding that the Petitioner met the authorship of scholarly articles criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=22387
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

电子 / 电气工程64 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three criteria at step one, though AAO noted the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three criteria at step one, though AAO noted the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=22389
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

电子 / 电气工程64 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO concurred with the Director's finding that the Petitioner met the judging criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concurred with the Director's finding that the Petitioner met the judging criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=22385
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the Petitioner's authorship of scholarly articles in relevant journals, with significant citation levels, satisfied this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's authorship of scholarly articles in relevant journals, with significant citation levels, satisfied this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_05_B2203; source_row=22412
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's service on the editorial board for the journal Matters satisfied the judging criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's service on the editorial board for the journal Matters satisfied the judging criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_05_B2203; source_row=22410
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

60 months of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience

证据为何得到认可

Under Matter of O-A-, Inc., the provisional certificate qualifies as the degree-conferral date here, and the additional evidence on appeal establishes the disputed prior-employer experience by a preponderance.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Under Matter of O-A-, Inc., the provisional certificate qualifies as the degree-conferral date here, and the additional evidence on appeal establishes the disputed prior-employer experience by a preponderance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-22_01_B5203; source_row=22381
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评