AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the testimonial letters were insufficient because they did not identify specific tournaments where the Petitioner judged, did not explain the basis for the declarants' knowledge, and a subsequent letter failed to confirm the Petitioner's actual service. The Petitioner himself acknowledged no official records or published documentation of his committee participation exist.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the testimonial letters were insufficient because they did not identify specific tournaments where the Petitioner judged, did not explain the basis for the declarants' knowledge, and a subsequent letter failed to confirm the Petitioner's actual service. The Petitioner himself acknowledged no official records or published documentation of his committee participation exist.
AAO found that the submitted articles were not 'about' the Petitioner as required — they merely mentioned him as one of many participants. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to establish that the publications were professional or major trade publications or other major media, relying only on self-promotional assertions from the publisher. Many articles also lacked the required author attribution.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the submitted articles were not 'about' the Petitioner as required — they merely mentioned him as one of many participants. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to establish that the publications were professional or major trade publications or other major media, relying only on self-promotional assertions from the publisher. Many articles also lacked the required author attribution.
Petitioner did not provide a detailed description of the agreement with former counsel outlining specific actions counsel would take, and the June 2017 refund request letter did not sufficiently show that former counsel was informed of the ineffective-assistance allegation and given an opportunity to respond.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not provide a detailed description of the agreement with former counsel outlining specific actions counsel would take, and the June 2017 refund request letter did not sufficiently show that former counsel was informed of the ineffective-assistance allegation and given an opportunity to respond.
Even if counsel had waited until after publication of the first article and submitted all evidence with the filing, the record does not show the outcome would have been different.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Even if counsel had waited until after publication of the first article and submitted all evidence with the filing, the record does not show the outcome would have been different.
labor certification demonstrates need for advanced degree
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that the preponderance of the evidence, including the Petitioner's recruitment materials and the labor certification language itself, demonstrates the position requires an advanced degree, and the Director's contrary interpretation was incorrect.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the preponderance of the evidence, including the Petitioner's recruitment materials and the labor certification language itself, demonstrates the position requires an advanced degree, and the Director's contrary interpretation was incorrect.