AAO addressed this in final merits, finding that the comparator occupations were not sufficiently similar to the Beneficiary's role and that the salary data showed earnings just above the median but well below the top decile for his field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO addressed this in final merits, finding that the comparator occupations were not sufficiently similar to the Beneficiary's role and that the salary data showed earnings just above the median but well below the top decile for his field.
AAO found that the Beneficiary's six peer reviews, 11 total citations, three journal articles, one conference paper, and critical role at his employer, taken together, do not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Beneficiary's six peer reviews, 11 total citations, three journal articles, one conference paper, and critical role at his employer, taken together, do not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field. Citation data contradicted petitioner's claims about top-percentile ranking, salary comparisons used dissimilar occupations, and company press coverage did not mention the Beneficiary personally.
AAO did not separately resolve this at step 1, addressing it instead in final merits, finding insufficient evidence that the Beneficiary's work has been widely implemented or achieved major significance in the field.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately resolve this at step 1, addressing it instead in final merits, finding insufficient evidence that the Beneficiary's work has been widely implemented or achieved major significance in the field.
nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO did not separately rule on this criterion at step 1 but addressed the awards evidence in the final merits determination, finding that the graduate scholarship and venture capital funding do not constitute nationally or internationally recognized awards for excellence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately rule on this criterion at step 1 but addressed the awards evidence in the final merits determination, finding that the graduate scholarship and venture capital funding do not constitute nationally or internationally recognized awards for excellence.
AAO disagreed with the Director and found the Beneficiary has performed in a critical role for the Petitioner, an organization that has a distinguished reputation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the Director and found the Beneficiary has performed in a critical role for the Petitioner, an organization that has a distinguished reputation.
Beneficiary's standing as affected party in revocation proceedings
裁决如何说明
The AAO declined to determine the Beneficiary's portability eligibility on the current record, finding that the Director must first make that determination on remand before any merits decision can be issued.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to determine the Beneficiary's portability eligibility on the current record, finding that the Director must first make that determination on remand before any merits decision can be issued.
Notice of Filing posting requirements for roving employees
AAO 为什么未被说服
DOL guidance requires posting at client worksites for roving employees in addition to internal print/electronic notice; Petitioner did not show such posting at client sites.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
DOL guidance requires posting at client worksites for roving employees in addition to internal print/electronic notice; Petitioner did not show such posting at client sites.
The Beneficiary holds a U.S. master's degree, which is above a baccalaureate, and the field requires a degree, making him an advanced degree professional.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Beneficiary holds a U.S. master's degree, which is above a baccalaureate, and the field requires a degree, making him an advanced degree professional.