AAO noted that the petitioner's claim under criterion (v) would be considered in the final merits determination rather than as a standalone step-1 finding.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted that the petitioner's claim under criterion (v) would be considered in the final merits determination rather than as a standalone step-1 finding.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner submitted photographs and press clippings about pageant titles but failed to demonstrate the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted photographs and press clippings about pageant titles but failed to demonstrate the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
Articles appeared in newspapers, magazines, websites and blogs but Petitioner did not establish these were professional or major trade publications or other major media; reliance on Wikipedia for circulation data was rejected, and one article lacked an author.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Articles appeared in newspapers, magazines, websites and blogs but Petitioner did not establish these were professional or major trade publications or other major media; reliance on Wikipedia for circulation data was rejected, and one article lacked an author.
AAO found the articles were mainly about Irish dance students who mentioned the Petitioner as their instructor, not published material about the Petitioner herself. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate the articles appeared in professional or major trade publications or other major media, having provided no circulation numbers or comparable evidence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the articles were mainly about Irish dance students who mentioned the Petitioner as their instructor, not published material about the Petitioner herself. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate the articles appeared in professional or major trade publications or other major media, having provided no circulation numbers or comparable evidence.
AAO found the Petitioner failed to provide comparative salary data for other Irish dance instructors. Evidence of her own earnings alone is insufficient to establish that her salary is high relative to others performing similar work.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to provide comparative salary data for other Irish dance instructors. Evidence of her own earnings alone is insufficient to establish that her salary is high relative to others performing similar work.
AAO held that the plain language of the criterion requires the petitioner herself to have received nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards. Students' awards do not satisfy this requirement.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held that the plain language of the criterion requires the petitioner herself to have received nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards. Students' awards do not satisfy this requirement.
AAO rejected the Petitioner's interpretation of the regulation, finding that it requires associations whose membership is limited to those with outstanding achievements as judged by national or international experts.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO rejected the Petitioner's interpretation of the regulation, finding that it requires associations whose membership is limited to those with outstanding achievements as judged by national or international experts. The submitted examination requirements showed only a competency standard, not outstanding achievement, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the examining authority members are nationally or internationally recognized.
AAO disagreed with the Director and withdrew that finding. The letters of recommendation praised the Petitioner's skills and her students' successes but did not identify specific contributions of major significance or explain how the Petitioner influenced the field as a whole. Teaching individual students who excel in competitions is not itself a contribution of major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the Director and withdrew that finding. The letters of recommendation praised the Petitioner's skills and her students' successes but did not identify specific contributions of major significance or explain how the Petitioner influenced the field as a whole. Teaching individual students who excel in competitions is not itself a contribution of major significance.
Petitioner served on the audition panel of a Nigerian modeling agency, supported by an advertisement identifying her as a panelist and a thank-you letter from the agency.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner served on the audition panel of a Nigerian modeling agency, supported by an advertisement identifying her as a panelist and a thank-you letter from the agency.