可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 16151–16160

EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases (comparable evidence)

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the display criterion does not readily apply to composers/lyricists since 'display' implies a visual component, and accepted comparable evidence: revues celebrating Petitioner's compositions at distinguished venues with favorable reviews are sufficiently analogous to visual artistic display.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the display criterion does not readily apply to composers/lyricists since 'display' implies a visual component, and accepted comparable evidence: revues celebrating Petitioner's compositions at distinguished venues with favorable reviews are sufficiently analogous to visual artistic display.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_04_B2203; source_row=22286
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

证据为何得到认可

AAO conducted the final merits determination and concluded the totality of the evidence demonstrates sustained national or international acclaim and that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO conducted the final merits determination and concluded the totality of the evidence demonstrates sustained national or international acclaim and that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_04_B2203; source_row=22287
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner served as one of three paid judges for an initiative supporting musical theater organizations, evaluating artistic merit, which falls within his field or an allied field.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner served as one of three paid judges for an initiative supporting musical theater organizations, evaluating artistic merit, which falls within his field or an allied field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_04_B2203; source_row=22285
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien

证据为何得到认可

Several articles are specifically about the Petitioner and appear in major media in Australia, with independent readership data showing major media status.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Several articles are specifically about the Petitioner and appear in major media in Australia, with independent readership data showing major media status.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_04_B2203; source_row=22284
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

awards

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner received several monetary awards including the [REDACTED] Prize for Music Theatre, with newspaper coverage of selections.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner received several monetary awards including the [REDACTED] Prize for Music Theatre, with newspaper coverage of selections.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_04_B2203; source_row=22283
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion through his published articles in professional publications.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion through his published articles in professional publications.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=22268
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met this criterion based on his manuscript reviews for several journals.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met this criterion based on his manuscript reviews for several journals.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=22266
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

Not separately revisited at step 1; AAO indicated evidence would be considered in the final merits determination.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Not separately revisited at step 1; AAO indicated evidence would be considered in the final merits determination.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=22267
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

证据为何得到认可

AAO determined that the Petitioner performed a critical role for a distinguished organization, contrary to the Director's conclusion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO determined that the Petitioner performed a critical role for a distinguished organization, contrary to the Director's conclusion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=22269
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

裁决如何说明

AAO did not separately revisit this criterion at step 1; relevant evidence was considered in the final merits determination.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately revisit this criterion at step 1; relevant evidence was considered in the final merits determination.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=22263
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评