Inclusion in a book does not constitute 'membership' in an association, the selection standards were not shown to be equivalent to 'outstanding achievements,' the selection team was not shown to comprise recognized national or international experts, and employment or collaboration with other photographers does not constitute association membership.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Inclusion in a book does not constitute 'membership' in an association, the selection standards were not shown to be equivalent to 'outstanding achievements,' the selection team was not shown to comprise recognized national or international experts, and employment or collaboration with other photographers does not constitute association membership.
Tax returns showed personal income of $79,500, not $170,000 (which was corporate gross revenue); while this is at the higher end of median wages for photographers, the Petitioner did not show it is high compared to other high fashion photographers, and data showed top-end photographer earnings of $100,000 exceeded his salary.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Tax returns showed personal income of $79,500, not $170,000 (which was corporate gross revenue); while this is at the higher end of median wages for photographers, the Petitioner did not show it is high compared to other high fashion photographers, and data showed top-end photographer earnings of $100,000 exceeded his salary.
Letters praising the Petitioner's skills and work do not explain how his contributions are of major significance to the field at large; some letters described post-filing events; letters that merely repeat regulatory language without explaining influence on the field are insufficient; USCIS need not accept conclusory statements.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Letters praising the Petitioner's skills and work do not explain how his contributions are of major significance to the field at large; some letters described post-filing events; letters that merely repeat regulatory language without explaining influence on the field are insufficient; USCIS need not accept conclusory statements.
AAO found that publications and citation counts do not by themselves demonstrate major significance; the recommendation letters were largely conclusory and did not explain how the Petitioner's specific contributions have already widely impacted the field. Prospective or anticipated impacts do not satisfy the criterion.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that publications and citation counts do not by themselves demonstrate major significance; the recommendation letters were largely conclusory and did not explain how the Petitioner's specific contributions have already widely impacted the field. Prospective or anticipated impacts do not satisfy the criterion.
The record does not show a U.S. master's degree or foreign equivalent, and while it establishes the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree, there is no evidence of the five years of progressive post-baccalaureate specialty experience required as an alternative path to advanced degree qualification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record does not show a U.S. master's degree or foreign equivalent, and while it establishes the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree, there is no evidence of the five years of progressive post-baccalaureate specialty experience required as an alternative path to advanced degree qualification.
The Beneficiary holds only the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree and did not have five years of post-baccalaureate progressive experience by the petition's priority date, so she cannot meet the advanced degree requirement under either path.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Beneficiary holds only the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree and did not have five years of post-baccalaureate progressive experience by the petition's priority date, so she cannot meet the advanced degree requirement under either path.
AAO independently found the Beneficiary fails to qualify as an advanced degree professional both because the foreign degree equates only to a U.S. bachelor's and because there is no evidence of five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience by the priority date.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO independently found the Beneficiary fails to qualify as an advanced degree professional both because the foreign degree equates only to a U.S. bachelor's and because there is no evidence of five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience by the priority date.
The Beneficiary holds the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree only. The record does not show a foreign equivalent of a master's degree, nor does it demonstrate five years of post-baccalaureate progressive experience that would serve as the master's equivalent under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Beneficiary holds the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree only. The record does not show a foreign equivalent of a master's degree, nor does it demonstrate five years of post-baccalaureate progressive experience that would serve as the master's equivalent under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Beneficiary possession of minimum education required by labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The three expert evaluations were found deficient: one misapplied the Carnegie Unit (which does not apply to higher education), failed to indicate how credits were calculated, and relied on unsupported assumptions about classroom hours; another did not explain its credit calculations or equate credits to U.S. accredited institutions. EDGE, a peer-reviewed and court-recognized source, equates the Beneficiary's diploma to a U.S.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The three expert evaluations were found deficient: one misapplied the Carnegie Unit (which does not apply to higher education), failed to indicate how credits were calculated, and relied on unsupported assumptions about classroom hours; another did not explain its credit calculations or equate credits to U.S. accredited institutions. EDGE, a peer-reviewed and court-recognized source, equates the Beneficiary's diploma to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The U.S. program examples all required a prior bachelor's degree, unlike the Beneficiary's integrated program. AILA conference minutes are not binding on USCIS.