可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 16311–16320

NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

possession of U.S. bachelor's degree or single-source foreign equivalent degree

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO concludes that even if the certificate is an official academic record, it is not a 'degree' from a college or university authorized under Indian law to confer degrees, and the three-year Indian bachelor's degree only equates to three years of U.S. university studies.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concludes that even if the certificate is an official academic record, it is not a 'degree' from a college or university authorized under Indian law to confer degrees, and the three-year Indian bachelor's degree only equates to three years of U.S. university studies.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-29_03_B5203; source_row=22112
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

minimum experience in substantially different position

AAO 为什么未被说服

Multiple conflicting letters from the Petitioner's vice president—one describing the same duties as the offered position, another stating no duties overlapped, and a third claiming the Beneficiary had experience 'in the position offered'—created unresolved discrepancies.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Multiple conflicting letters from the Petitioner's vice president—one describing the same duties as the offered position, another stating no duties overlapped, and a third claiming the Beneficiary had experience 'in the position offered'—created unresolved discrepancies. Counsel's unsupported assertion of inadvertent error does not constitute evidence, and the organizational chart and missing percentage-of-time data further undermined the Petitioner's claims.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-29_02_B5203; source_row=22110
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

ability to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO raised this issue sua sponte. The record lacked required annual reports, tax returns, or audited financial statements for 2015 and 2016, and contained no information to assess the Petitioner's ability to pay combined proffered wages across 101 other petitions filed after the priority date.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO raised this issue sua sponte. The record lacked required annual reports, tax returns, or audited financial statements for 2015 and 2016, and contained no information to assess the Petitioner's ability to pay combined proffered wages across 101 other petitions filed after the priority date.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-29_02_B5203; source_row=22111
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

Payments to the Beneficiary in 2016 ($66,510.57 through July 15) fell below the annual proffered wage range, and the CFO letter is insufficient given multiple other I-140 filings without information about combined proffered wages.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Payments to the Beneficiary in 2016 ($66,510.57 through July 15) fell below the annual proffered wage range, and the CFO letter is insufficient given multiple other I-140 filings without information about combined proffered wages.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-29_03_B5203; source_row=22113
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

other

Net income and net current assets

AAO 为什么未被说服

For 2015, the Petitioner's net income was $30,010 and net current assets were -$99, insufficient to cover the $75,608 shortfall. For 2016, net income was $47,057 and net current assets were -$3,623, insufficient to cover the $50,890 shortfall.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
For 2015, the Petitioner's net income was $30,010 and net current assets were -$99, insufficient to cover the $75,608 shortfall. For 2016, net income was $47,057 and net current assets were -$3,623, insufficient to cover the $50,890 shortfall.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-29_01_B5203; source_row=22108
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

other

Wages actually paid to beneficiary

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not employ the Beneficiary in 2015, and in 2016 paid only $24,718 of the $75,608 proffered wage, falling short in both years. Paying at the hourly rate equivalent to the proffered wage does not satisfy the continuing requirement dating back to the November 7, 2015 priority date.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not employ the Beneficiary in 2015, and in 2016 paid only $24,718 of the $75,608 proffered wage, falling short in both years. Paying at the hourly rate equivalent to the proffered wage does not satisfy the continuing requirement dating back to the November 7, 2015 priority date.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-29_01_B5203; source_row=22107
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

other

Totality of business circumstances (Sonegawa)

AAO 为什么未被说服

Bank statements reflect funds on a given date rather than a sustained ability to pay. The Petitioner failed to submit financial history supporting claimed success since 2005, showed declining rather than growing revenue, did not claim extraordinary losses or expenses, and submitted no evidence of industry reputation such as client letters.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Bank statements reflect funds on a given date rather than a sustained ability to pay. The Petitioner failed to submit financial history supporting claimed success since 2005, showed declining rather than growing revenue, did not claim extraordinary losses or expenses, and submitted no evidence of industry reputation such as client letters.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-29_01_B5203; source_row=22109
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

five years post-baccalaureate experience equivalent to master's degree

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO conducted a case-specific analysis and found that completing coursework in 1997 did not satisfy all substantive requirements for the Titulo, which also requires a thesis, social service period, and professional examination.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO conducted a case-specific analysis and found that completing coursework in 1997 did not satisfy all substantive requirements for the Titulo, which also requires a thesis, social service period, and professional examination. The Pasante documents do not establish degree conferral, and AACRAO EDGE materials—including the source cited by the Petitioner's own evaluator—confirm that a Pasante should not be treated as equivalent to a Titulo or U.S. bachelor's degree.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-28_01_B5203; source_row=22104
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

ability to pay the proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Director erred by failing to conduct a full Sonegawa analysis and by failing to address the totality of the Petitioner's circumstances and the other evidence submitted. The case was remanded for a new analysis considering 2016 evidence and the Sonegawa factors.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director erred by failing to conduct a full Sonegawa analysis and by failing to address the totality of the Petitioner's circumstances and the other evidence submitted. The case was remanded for a new analysis considering 2016 evidence and the Sonegawa factors.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-28_02_B5203; source_row=22105
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

beneficiary meets minimum educational requirements of labor certification

裁决如何说明

AAO noted the Beneficiary's degree is in applied mathematics, which may or may not satisfy the labor certification's requirement of information systems, computer science, or engineering. AAO reserved this question for the Director to resolve on remand.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted the Beneficiary's degree is in applied mathematics, which may or may not satisfy the labor certification's requirement of information systems, computer science, or engineering. AAO reserved this question for the Director to resolve on remand.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-28_02_B5203; source_row=22106
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评