可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 16351–16360

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

10 years experience as artistic director per labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

The labor certification expressly required 10 years as an artistic director with no alternate experience permitted. The Beneficiary's prior positions had different titles and included unrelated duties. The attempted amendment to allow alternate experience was impermissible after July 16, 2007. AAO found the Beneficiary did not meet the labor certification's experience requirements.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification expressly required 10 years as an artistic director with no alternate experience permitted. The Beneficiary's prior positions had different titles and included unrelated duties. The attempted amendment to allow alternate experience was impermissible after July 16, 2007. AAO found the Beneficiary did not meet the labor certification's experience requirements.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=22074
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWacademic record已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

academic record

academic record / degree in area of exceptional ability

证据为何得到认可

The Beneficiary's educational credentials (foreign equivalent of an MFA with honors) satisfy the criterion at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A).

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Beneficiary's educational credentials (foreign equivalent of an MFA with honors) satisfy the criterion at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=22071
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

membership in international associations requiring outstanding achievement (20 C.F.R. § 656.15(d)(1)(ii))

AAO 为什么未被说服

The association's evidence did not support that it qualifies as an international association, and its membership criteria (degree, juried event participation, sales to local authorities) did not require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized international experts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The association's evidence did not support that it qualifies as an international association, and its membership criteria (degree, juried event participation, sales to local authorities) did not require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized international experts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=22076
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

prospective position requires exceptional ability (20 C.F.R. § 656.15(d)(1))

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner provided only generic duties and a generic timeline without specific material explaining how the Beneficiary's prospective position requires exceptional ability. The firm's past projects and accolades were insufficient without connecting them to the specific requirements of the position.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner provided only generic duties and a generic timeline without specific material explaining how the Beneficiary's prospective position requires exceptional ability. The firm's past projects and accolades were insufficient without connecting them to the specific requirements of the position.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=22080
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能12 篇论文1,981 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the scholarly articles criterion was met based on the Petitioner's authored articles in professional publications.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the scholarly articles criterion was met based on the Petitioner's authored articles in professional publications.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=22068
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能12 篇论文1,981 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

证据为何得到认可

AAO disagreed with the Director and found that the Petitioner performed a critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation, based on letters indicating he is central to the company's primary growth strategy.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the Director and found that the Petitioner performed a critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation, based on letters indicating he is central to the company's primary growth strategy.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=22069
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能12 篇论文1,981 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the judging criterion was met based on manuscript reviews for journals and technical conference publications.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the judging criterion was met based on manuscript reviews for journals and technical conference publications.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=22066
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree or foreign equivalent

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO previously found, contrary to the Director, that the Petitioner did not establish eligibility as an advanced-degree professional, and the current motion fails to cure the defect because no credentials evaluation was provided.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously found, contrary to the Director, that the Petitioner did not establish eligibility as an advanced-degree professional, and the current motion fails to cure the defect because no credentials evaluation was provided.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-20_01_B5203; source_row=22059
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

criteria (B) through (E)

AAO 为什么未被说服

Petitioner submitted no new evidence on motion regarding criteria (B) through (E).

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner submitted no new evidence on motion regarding criteria (B) through (E).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-20_01_B5203; source_row=22061
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWrecognition未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions

AAO 为什么未被说服

Both pieces of evidence post-date the petition's filing and, regardless, do not demonstrate recognition by peers, governmental entities, or professional/business organizations.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both pieces of evidence post-date the petition's filing and, regardless, do not demonstrate recognition by peers, governmental entities, or professional/business organizations.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-20_01_B5203; source_row=22062
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评