可追溯来源的裁决研究
检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。
从大量个案裁决理由中检索，再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。
本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录，而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误；标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率，也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。
10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定
当前显示 1651–1660
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
审查的问题
EB-1A · 学术论文作者
scholarly articles
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed with the Director that the scholarly articles criterion was established, noting roughly 20 peer-reviewed publications.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the scholarly articles criterion was established, noting roughly 20 peer-reviewed publications.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_01_B2203; source_row=42706
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
审查的问题
NIW · 有能力推进事业
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
裁决如何说明
AAO explicitly reserved prong two as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong one.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved prong two as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong one.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_01_B5203; source_row=42709
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
审查的问题
NIW · 综合权衡
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO explicitly reserved prong three as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong one.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved prong three as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong one.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_01_B5203; source_row=42710
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
审查的问题
NIW · 有能力推进事业
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
裁决如何说明
AAO did not reach the second prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the second prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_03_B5203; source_row=42724
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
审查的问题
NIW · 综合权衡
on balance beneficial to the United States to waive job offer
裁决如何说明
AAO did not reach the third prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the third prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_03_B5203; source_row=42725
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
审查的问题
EB-1A · 评审
judging the work of others
证据为何得到认可
AAO acknowledged the Director's finding that this criterion was met and did not disturb it.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO acknowledged the Director's finding that this criterion was met and did not disturb it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_02_B2203; source_row=42714
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
审查的问题
EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations
裁决如何说明
AAO reserved this criterion because, even if met, the Petitioner could not reach the required three criteria.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this criterion because, even if met, the Petitioner could not reach the required three criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_02_B2203; source_row=42716
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
审查的问题
EB-1A · 媒体报道
published material
证据为何得到认可
AAO affirmed that the Petitioner meets the published material criterion, consistent with the Director's finding.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed that the Petitioner meets the published material criterion, consistent with the Director's finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_03_B2203; source_row=42718
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
审查的问题
EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色
leading or critical role
证据为何得到认可
AAO affirmed that the Petitioner meets the leading or critical role criterion, consistent with the Director's finding.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed that the Petitioner meets the leading or critical role criterion, consistent with the Director's finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_03_B2203; source_row=42721
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
审查的问题
EB-1A · 最终综合评估
final merits determination
裁决如何说明
AAO reserves the final merits determination because the Petitioner's failure to meet three criteria is dispositive, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserves the final merits determination because the Petitioner's failure to meet three criteria is dispositive, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_03_B2203; source_row=42722
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗