AAO noted it had previously analyzed the significance of his software applications and reference letters and found the original contributions criterion was not met.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted it had previously analyzed the significance of his software applications and reference letters and found the original contributions criterion was not met.
Translations of television interviews and promotional videos were uncertified and incomplete, and the videos concerned the Petitioner's software application rather than being published material about the Petitioner.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Translations of television interviews and promotional videos were uncertified and incomplete, and the videos concerned the Petitioner's software application rather than being published material about the Petitioner.
AAO found the Petitioner failed to identify which criteria did not apply to a jiu jitsu instructor, did not explain why those criteria did not apply, and did not establish how his documentation was comparable.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to identify which criteria did not apply to a jiu jitsu instructor, did not explain why those criteria did not apply, and did not establish how his documentation was comparable.
AAO found that even with the amended tax return showing $49,780 income, the Petitioner's earnings fell below the average for jiu jitsu coaches in Florida and did not constitute a high or significantly high salary relative to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that even with the amended tax return showing $49,780 income, the Petitioner's earnings fell below the average for jiu jitsu coaches in Florida and did not constitute a high or significantly high salary relative to others in the field.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO addressed this criterion although the Director did not, finding that the four certificates and references to 'titles' lacked sufficient evidence to demonstrate they were nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO addressed this criterion although the Director did not, finding that the four certificates and references to 'titles' lacked sufficient evidence to demonstrate they were nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concluded the membership card and letter regarding the Petitioner's third-degree black belt status did not show that the membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the membership card and letter regarding the Petitioner's third-degree black belt status did not show that the membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.