lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
证据为何得到认可
The record supports the Director's finding that the Petitioner satisfies this criterion, reflecting awards for superior hosting and voice acting in 2009 and 2010, festival awards, and a TV contest award in 2005.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record supports the Director's finding that the Petitioner satisfies this criterion, reflecting awards for superior hosting and voice acting in 2009 and 2010, festival awards, and a TV contest award in 2005.
Five years of experience 'in the specialty' for advanced degree classification
AAO 为什么未被说服
Legislative history establishes that the specialty is the position's profession, not its required field of study. Teaching is identified in the Act as a distinct profession from other educational occupations, so the Beneficiary's approximately 44 months of teaching experience and approximately 22 months of assistant principal experience represent two separate specialties, falling short of the five-year single-specialty requ…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Legislative history establishes that the specialty is the position's profession, not its required field of study. Teaching is identified in the Act as a distinct profession from other educational occupations, so the Beneficiary's approximately 44 months of teaching experience and approximately 22 months of assistant principal experience represent two separate specialties, falling short of the five-year single-specialty requirement.
AAO found that the labor certification does not specify a field for the alternative bachelor's degree, and the Petitioner's recruitment evidence — including consideration of a candidate with a non-specified degree field — demonstrated acceptance of a bachelor's degree in any field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the labor certification does not specify a field for the alternative bachelor's degree, and the Petitioner's recruitment evidence — including consideration of a candidate with a non-specified degree field — demonstrated acceptance of a bachelor's degree in any field.
Five years of post-baccalaureate qualifying experience (quantity)
AAO 为什么未被说服
An overseas investigation revealed that the principal of the first school denied writing or signing a letter and did not know anyone with the Beneficiary's name, while officials at the second school also could not confirm the Beneficiary's employment.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
An overseas investigation revealed that the principal of the first school denied writing or signing a letter and did not know anyone with the Beneficiary's name, while officials at the second school also could not confirm the Beneficiary's employment. The Turkish work permits showed only part-time hours (15 and 20 hours per week), and despite affidavits attempting to explain away inconsistencies, the record lacked independent objective evidence to resolve them.
date of attainment of foreign equivalent bachelor's degree
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed the degree was not established to have been attained before the March 7, 2008 diploma issuance, but reached this conclusion through a case-specific 'official academic record' analysis under Matter of O-A- rather than the Director's diploma-date arithmetic.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the degree was not established to have been attained before the March 7, 2008 diploma issuance, but reached this conclusion through a case-specific 'official academic record' analysis under Matter of O-A- rather than the Director's diploma-date arithmetic.
five years of post-baccalaureate experience equivalent to advanced degree
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed that the experience must be counted from September 7, 2010, as the Petitioner failed to provide an official academic record demonstrating that all substantive degree requirements were met and the degree approved prior to that date. The I/C Principal letter was not an official academic record as it was retroactively written, issued on request, and only stated the Beneficiary was 'eligible' for the degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the experience must be counted from September 7, 2010, as the Petitioner failed to provide an official academic record demonstrating that all substantive degree requirements were met and the degree approved prior to that date. The I/C Principal letter was not an official academic record as it was retroactively written, issued on request, and only stated the Beneficiary was 'eligible' for the degree.
labor certification supports advanced degree professional classification
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed with the Director that the H.14 'in lieu of' language extended beyond Kellogg and permitted minimum qualifications below an advanced degree. The Petitioner's recruiting materials repeated the same language and did not clarify what 'suitable combination' meant, so even considering intent the record was insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the H.14 'in lieu of' language extended beyond Kellogg and permitted minimum qualifications below an advanced degree. The Petitioner's recruiting materials repeated the same language and did not clarify what 'suitable combination' meant, so even considering intent the record was insufficient.
five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO affirmed that the Beneficiary did not possess at least five years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience because his degree was not shown to have been attained before March 2008.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed that the Beneficiary did not possess at least five years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience because his degree was not shown to have been attained before March 2008.
Letters referencing international broadcast did not include objective ratings data or sales statistics, and the criterion requires evidence of volume of sales and receipts as a measure of commercial success.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Letters referencing international broadcast did not include objective ratings data or sales statistics, and the criterion requires evidence of volume of sales and receipts as a measure of commercial success.
Providing instruction and training to acting students is not the same as participating as a judge. The regulation requires a formal judging designation, and the letter lacked specifics about actors whose work was judged or performances evaluated.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Providing instruction and training to acting students is not the same as participating as a judge. The regulation requires a formal judging designation, and the letter lacked specifics about actors whose work was judged or performances evaluated.